Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 140%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 139%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics141% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive263% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 7  (all builds)
Memory25.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180302
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 26 '18 at 18:49
Run Duration263 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7820X-$195
, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
Memory 85.9
1-Core 149
2-Core 297
96% 177 Pts
4-Core 593
8-Core 951
95% 772 Pts
64-Core 1,559
96% 1,559 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$237
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2928 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 397.93
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
141% Outstanding
Lighting 202
Reflection 212
Parallax 204
165% 206 fps
MRender 133
Gravity 194
Splatting 132
124% 153 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 141%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO 500GB
836GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 526
Write 416
Mixed 432
102% 458 MB/s
4K Read 35.3
4K Write 70
4K Mixed 41.5
144% 48.9 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 217
DQ Mixed 130
141% 240 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 104%
Great: 129%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$119
351GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
263% Outstanding
Read 2,139
Write 1,708
Mixed 1,724
413% 1,857 MB/s
4K Read 35.8
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 56.2
189% 70.1 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 265
DQ Mixed 157
162% 268 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 263%
Great: 353%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$66
1TB free
Firmware: CC41 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
78.9% Very good
Read 102
Write 172
Mixed 136
103% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.78
4K Write 5.31
4K Mixed 0.85
225% 2.31 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 110%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$66
939GB free
Firmware: CC41 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Read 102
Write 178
Mixed 118
99% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.67
4K Write 5.17
4K Mixed 0.84
217% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 110%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$66
924GB free
Firmware: CC41 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
77.4% Very good
Read 101
Write 167
Mixed 97.1
91% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.75
4K Write 5.27
4K Mixed 0.76
213% 2.26 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 110%
H/W DISK 2 3TB
3TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
69.4% Good
Read 171
Write 188
Mixed 132
209% 163 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.16
4K Mixed 0.24
50% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 72%
H/W DISK 3 2TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
43.7% Average
Read 113
Write 105
Mixed 50.1
108% 89.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.75
4K Write 1.35
4K Mixed 0.41
63% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 44%
H/W DISK 1 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Read 160
Write 158
Mixed 101
174% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.33
4K Write 0.61
4K Mixed 0.11
26% 0.35 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 60%
H/W DISK 4 2TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 90.2
59% 90.2 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
98.4% Outstanding
MC Read 30.2
MC Write 57.2
MC Mixed 28
110% 38.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 27.1
SC Mixed 12
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 71.3
56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 98.4%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 7 Builds (Compare 384 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $572
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback