Asus MAXIMUS V EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics33.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive77.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS V EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory21.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120807
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 24 '18 at 17:30
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User EST-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Memory 94.8
1-Core 108
2-Core 191
78% 131 Pts
4-Core 378
8-Core 535
57% 456 Pts
64-Core 552
34% 552 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680-$360
Asus(1043 83F1) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
33.2% Below average
Lighting 39.8
Reflection 36.9
Parallax 48.4
32% 41.7 fps
MRender 49.6
Gravity 46.9
Splatting 34.2
35% 43.6 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
77.5% Very good
Read 514
Write 329
Mixed 391
91% 412 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 84
4K Mixed 22.7
101% 41.6 MB/s
DQ Read 113
DQ Write 176
DQ Mixed 14.9
48% 101 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 97%
Seagate ST33000650NS 3TB-$100
910GB free
Firmware: 0004 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
69.7% Good
Read 128
Write 115
Mixed 127
93% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 2.25
4K Mixed 0.51
121% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMZ8GX3M2A1866C9 859B BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1866C9 859B BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
60.5% Good
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 20.5
MC Mixed 18.6
58% 20.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 21
56% 19.5 GB/s
Latency 57.6
70% 57.6 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS V EXTREME Builds (Compare 310 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS V EXTREME - $550

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $1,020
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $162Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback