Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 28% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	9.27% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	75.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.

System	VMware, VMware Virtual Platform
Motherboard	Intel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory	1.4 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20150702
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 13 '16 at 10:53
Run Duration	92 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8320-$153 106,454 User benchmarks, average bench 59% CPU #000, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	48.4% Average	Memory 74.9 1-Core 66.3 2-Core 132 55% 90.9 Pts	4-Core 129 8-Core 132 17% 130 Pts	64-Core 131 8% 131 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 48.4% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Vmware SVGA 3D 11,474 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Vmware(15AD 0405) 1GB Driver: vm3dum64.dll Ver. 8.15.1.33 Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	9.27% Terrible	Lighting 10.1 Reflection 10.4 Parallax 9.19 8% 9.88 fps	MRender 15.5 Gravity 10.5 Splatting 15.2 11% 13.7 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 9.27% Great: 69%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Vmware, VMware Virtual S 38GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 24GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	75.7% Very good	Read 503 Write 453 Mixed 490 108% 482 MB/s	4K Read 24 4K Write 34.8 4K Mixed 21.4 82% 26.7 MB/s	DQ Read 66.3 DQ Write 60 DQ Mixed 32.8 33% 53 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 75.7% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 128 slots used 2GB DIMM DRAM Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	36.4% Below average	MC Read 16.3 MC Write 8.8 MC Mixed 13 36% 12.7 GB/s	SC Read 9.8 SC Write 6.9 SC Mixed 11.8 27% 9.5 GB/s	Latency 90.7 44% 90.7 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 36.4% Great: 26%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,147x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,062x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	830x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	458x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	433x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325