Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics0.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory29.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140403
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateApr 28 '18 at 22:27
Run Duration265 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
66.3% Good
Memory 82.5
1-Core 73.5
2-Core 146
61% 101 Pts
4-Core 271
8-Core 439
44% 355 Pts
64-Core 440
27% 440 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 68%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon X300/X550/X1050 Series
Device(14CD 0381) 64MB
Driver: atiumdag Ver. 8.56.1.16
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Lighting 0.77
Reflection 0.27
1% 0.52 fps
Nvidia GeForce 8400 GS
Device(0000 0000) 512MB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 8.15.11.8593
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.54% Terrible
Lighting 0.6
Reflection 0.77
Parallax 0.31
0% 0.56 fps
MRender 1.14
Gravity 0.43
Splatting 0.78
1% 0.79 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.54%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU 650 120GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q083 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
75.1% Very good
Read 460
Write 412
Mixed 448
98% 440 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 82.8
4K Mixed 5.17
85% 37 MB/s
DQ Read 134
DQ Write 230
DQ Mixed 5.69
54% 123 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 82%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
815GB free
Firmware: HP34 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
86.3% Excellent
Read 192
Write 109
Mixed 159
116% 153 MB/s
4K Read 0.57
4K Write 1.41
4K Mixed 0.3
83% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95
518GB free
Firmware: CC32 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 103
Write 82.1
Mixed 66
62% 83.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 0.72
4K Mixed 0.63
99% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 75%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA331 2TB
375GB free
Firmware: JKAO Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
43.3% Average
Read 73.8
Write 77.1
Mixed 81.3
58% 77.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 1.23
4K Mixed 0.31
78% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 68%
PNY USB 3.0 FD 134GB
3GB free, PID fa05
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
10.6% Very poor
Read 29.5
Write 27.9
Mixed 5.59
24% 21 MB/s
4K Read 0.71
4K Write 0.009
4K Mixed 0.15
8% 0.29 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73BH0-CK0 Corsair CML8GX3M1A1600C10 M378B1G73BH0-CK0 M378B1G73BH0-CK0 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.4% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 14.5
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 12.9
30% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 76
53% 76 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback