Acer AO532h

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, GPU, SSD, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemAcer AO532h  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer AO532h
Memory0.1 GB free of 1 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, ,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100317
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateApr 23 '18 at 19:13
Run Duration1215 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom N450
CPU, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.65 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 7.1
2-Core 11.5
4% 9.3 Pts
4-Core 11.5
8-Core 11.2
2% 11.4 Pts
64-Core 12.3
1% 12.3 Pts
Poor: 10% Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fujitsu MHV2100BH PL 100GB
30GB free
Firmware: 892C Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 5% Great: 22%
WD My Passport 25E4 2TB
589GB free (System drive), PID 25e4
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
13% Very poor
Read 26.8
Write 20.8
Mixed 21.1
28% 22.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.35
4K Write 1.46
4K Mixed 0.16
56% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13%
Great: 54%
USB Flash Disk 64GB
49GB free, PID null
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
4.4% Terrible
Read 17.9
Write 4.82
Mixed 6.51
10% 9.76 MB/s
4K Read 3.12
4K Write 0.004
4K Mixed 0.002
12% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.4%
Great: 35%
Combo_Drive 32GB
23GB free, PID null
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Read 18.4
Write 14.3
Mixed 16.7
21% 16.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.57
4K Write 2.13
4K Mixed 1.69
143% 2.46 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 13%
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $149Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback