Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 16% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Toshiba Satellite L505D (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory	0.5 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20090907
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 25 '22 at 19:14
Run Duration	211 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Turion II Mobile M500 606 User benchmarks, average bench 34% Socket S1G3, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	36.7% Below average	Memory 64.6 1-Core 16.2 2-Core 63.9 32% 48.2 Pts	4-Core 54 8-Core 55.8 7% 54.9 Pts	64-Core 62.4 4% 62.4 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 36.7% Great: 42%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon 4100 116 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Toshiba(1179 FF1F) 256MB Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 8.970.100.3000 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	0.91% Terrible	Lighting 1.3 Reflection 0.8 Parallax 1 1% 1.03 fps	MRender 0.7 Gravity 0.7 Splatting 0.8 1% 0.73 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.91% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Fujitsu MHV2100BH PL 100GB 266 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 47GB free (System drive) Firmware: 892C SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.4 7.3 6.1 4.9 8.5 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	5.31% Terrible	Read 10.7 Write 7.3 Mixed 11 SusWrite 7.8 7% 9.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 17% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.31% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M4 70T5663EH3-CF7 1x2GB 61 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR2 800 MHz Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	16.4% Very poor	MC Read 5.4 MC Write 5.3 MC Mixed 5.1 15% 5.27 GB/s	SC Read 3.4 SC Write 3.7 SC Mixed 4.8 11% 3.97 GB/s	Latency 115 35% 115 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 16.4% Great: 18%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 1%

Tree trunk

Desktop 25%

Raft

Workstation 1%

Tree trunk

CPU
Athlon II M320AMDBench 33%, 922 samples	3x
Turion II Mobile M500AMDBench 34%, 606 samples	2x
Athlon X2 Dual-Core QL-65AMDBench 29%, 518 samples	2x

GPU
Mobility Radeon HD 4250ATIBench 1%, 11,054 samples	4x
Mobility Radeon 4100ATIBench 0%, 116 samples	3x
Radeon 3100 GraphicsATIBench 0%, 456 samples	2x

RAM
3GBUnknownBench 14%, 81,553 samples	2x
CT51264AC800.C16FC 2x4GBCrucialBench 16%, 11 samples	2x
M4 70T5663QZ3-CF7 2x2GBSamsungBench 18%, 345 samples	1x

Value: 22% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16