Asrock Z87 Killer

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics58.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock Z87 Killer  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150514
Uptime2.7 Days
Run DateApr 19 '18 at 04:24
Run Duration243 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Memory 95
1-Core 130
2-Core 249
89% 158 Pts
4-Core 424
8-Core 676
68% 550 Pts
64-Core 664
41% 664 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Lighting 72.9
Reflection 73
Parallax 64.7
59% 70.2 fps
MRender 68.4
Gravity 68.1
Splatting 70.4
57% 68.9 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
52.3% Above average
Read 493
Write 69.6
Mixed 86.4
46% 216 MB/s
4K Read 40.5
4K Write 43.6
4K Mixed 8.13
95% 30.7 MB/s
DQ Read 38.6
DQ Write 48.1
DQ Mixed 8.89
16% 31.9 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 108%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
50GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
62.2% Good
Read 514
Write 28.1
Mixed 241
56% 261 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 93.5
4K Mixed 12
114% 46 MB/s
DQ Read 97.7
DQ Write 248
DQ Mixed 64.3
80% 137 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 124%
CT128V4SSD2 128GB
50GB free
Firmware: S5FAMM25 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
60.7% Good
Read 511
Write 118
Mixed 288
67% 306 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 3.86
91% 43.9 MB/s
DQ Read 33.3
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 10.8
60% 126 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 82%
Mushkin Chronos 120GB-$70
50GB free
Firmware: 502ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
54.8% Above average
Read 277
Write 121
Mixed 294
51% 230 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 21.8
115% 48.9 MB/s
DQ Read 35.5
DQ Write 70.1
DQ Mixed 45.7
37% 50.4 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 84%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$38
3TB free
Firmware: CC25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
67.5% Good
Read 124
Write 112
Mixed 101
84% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.66
4K Write 1.52
4K Mixed 0.62
124% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
3TB free
Firmware: CC38 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
65.5% Good
Read 116
Write 112
Mixed 105
84% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.85
4K Write 1.45
4K Mixed 0.46
114% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
AMD R938G2401U2S 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
66.1% Good
MC Read 23.9
MC Write 24.4
MC Mixed 19.3
64% 22.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 23.6
SC Mixed 21.9
60% 21.1 GB/s
Latency 57.2
70% 57.2 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z87 Killer Builds (Compare 424 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock Z87 Killer - $216

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $471
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback