Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics17% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive114% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170906
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateApr 13 '18 at 02:56
Run Duration623 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$179
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
98.3% Outstanding
Memory 90.1
1-Core 156
2-Core 303
100% 183 Pts
4-Core 571
8-Core 1,001
95% 786 Pts
64-Core 1,195
74% 1,195 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 100%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 480-$500
EVGA(3842 1480) 1.5GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 924 MHz, Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 353.54
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
17% Very poor
Lighting 20.7
Reflection 32.8
Parallax 23.5
17% 25.7 fps
MRender 19
Gravity 17.5
Splatting 24.6
17% 20.4 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 17%
Great: 22%
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4785
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.81% Terrible
Lighting 8.6
Reflection 11.3
Parallax 8.66
7% 9.53 fps
MRender 7.24
Gravity 7.7
Splatting 17
9% 10.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.81%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX6000 NVMe PCIe M.2 128GB-$45
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V6005-ab Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 683
Write 546
Mixed 543
131% 591 MB/s
4K Read 38.3
4K Write 91.1
4K Mixed 24.9
138% 51.4 MB/s
DQ Read 246
DQ Write 315
DQ Mixed 54
104% 205 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 114%
Great: 140%
WD WD5002AALX-00J37A0 500GB
835GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
65.6% Good
Read 117
Write 112
Mixed 114
86% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.67
4K Write 1.88
4K Mixed 0.52
120% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 72%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA660 500GB
835GB free
Firmware: JP2OA41A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
64.6% Good
Read 111
Write 114
Mixed 116
86% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.76
4K Write 1.82
4K Mixed 0.45
115% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 76%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2009)-$79
68GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
68.3% Good
Read 121
Write 117
Mixed 72.3
77% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.21
4K Write 1.61
4K Mixed 0.32
74% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 41%
Seagate ST9320423AS 320GB-$40
68GB free
Firmware: 0002SDM1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
61.1% Good
Read 107
Write 106
Mixed 89.5
76% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.24
4K Write 1.68
4K Mixed 0.16
59% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 51%
IT1172 USB Flash Disk 134GB
88GB free, PID 1172
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
2.36% Terrible
Read 11.8
Write 2.68
Mixed 3.85
6% 6.12 MB/s
4K Read 0.21
4K Write 0.002
4K Mixed 0.002
1% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.36%
Great: 4%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.5% Average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 11.2
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 14
SC Mixed 13.9
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 67.1
60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 3,069 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming - $170

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $637
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback