Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics21.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte A320M-H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190823
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 27 '22 at 13:23
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon X4 950 Quad Core
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
39.7% Below average
Memory 45.7
1-Core 71.3
2-Core 125
46% 80.5 Pts
4-Core 194
8-Core 206
26% 200 Pts
64-Core 210
13% 210 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 480-$500
Gigabyte(1458 3502) 1.5GB
CLim: 820 MHz, MLim: 950 MHz, Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 353.62
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
21.7% Poor
Lighting 26
Reflection 42.6
Parallax 30.6
21% 33.1 fps
MRender 31.3
Gravity 22.8
Splatting 28.5
23% 27.5 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 22%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3501103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 357 83 103 11 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
45.1% Average
Read 474
Write 397
Mixed 27.4
SusWrite 116
56% 254 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 13
4K Mixed 9
54% 15.2 MB/s
DQ Read 132
DQ Write 15.6
DQ Mixed 25.9
31% 57.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KM0VW4-MID Hynix HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.3% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 7.8
MC Mixed 13.3
33% 11.6 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 8.5
20% 7.1 GB/s
Latency 178
22% 178 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-H-CF Builds (Compare 3,026 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $255
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback