HP Z230 Tower Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics33.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemHP Z230 Tower Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1905
Memory17.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161018
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateApr 03 '18 at 12:00
Run Duration227 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 50%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1271 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
58% Above average
Memory 64.1
1-Core 77.6
2-Core 143
55% 94.9 Pts
4-Core 280
8-Core 479
46% 379 Pts
64-Core 507
31% 507 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 58%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M4000
Nvidia(10DE 1153) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 386.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
33.7% Below average
Lighting 41.3
Reflection 40.2
Parallax 36.6
34% 39.4 fps
MRender 49.9
Gravity 36.8
Splatting 38.8
34% 41.8 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZHPU256HCGL-000H1 256GB
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UXM62H1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 65% Great: 86%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
7.5TB free
Firmware: D781
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Read 158
Write 144
Mixed 98.5
99% 134 MB/s
4K Read 1.16
4K Write 7.21
4K Mixed 0.86
278% 3.08 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 92%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
4TB free
Firmware: D781
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
66.9% Good
Read 140
Write 91.3
Mixed 79.5
77% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1.03
4K Write 6.76
4K Mixed 0.58
233% 2.79 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 92%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: HP51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Read 141
Write 141
Mixed 80
89% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.74
4K Write 1.58
4K Mixed 0.25
87% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 114%
General USB Flash Disk 32GB
29GB free, PID 8381
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
17% Very poor
Read 76.7
Write 12.9
Mixed 30.1
40% 39.9 MB/s
4K Read 12.9
4K Write 0.02
4K Mixed 0.01
49% 4.32 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 17%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
46% Average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 14.9
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 14.4
39% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 116
34% 116 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z230 Tower Workstation Builds (Compare 2,785 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z230 Tower Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $175
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback