Asus P8H61-M LX3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics14.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8H61-M LX3  (all builds)
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140327
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 19 '18 at 04:43
Run Duration233 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G860-$73
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
58% Above average
Memory 90.2
1-Core 78.7
2-Core 132
63% 100 Pts
4-Core 153
8-Core 153
20% 153 Pts
64-Core 153
10% 153 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 58%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6850
Gigabyte(1458 21F8) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Lighting 18.7
Reflection 14.5
Parallax 15.6
15% 16.3 fps
MRender 12.8
Gravity 12.3
Splatting 18.4
12% 14.5 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AC01118 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 90.6
Write 88.6
Mixed 37.9
53% 72.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.58
4K Write 1.62
4K Mixed 0.37
95% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 62%
HUAWEI TF CARD Storage 2GB
1GB free, PID null
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
9.24% Terrible
Read 13.1
Write 6.75
Mixed 6.42
10% 8.77 MB/s
4K Read 1.73
4K Write 1.77
4K Mixed 0.78
93% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 9.24%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Goodram GR1600D364L11S/4G 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
28.3% Poor
MC Read 9.1
MC Write 8.9
MC Mixed 8.1
25% 8.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 8.7
25% 8.9 GB/s
Latency 67
60% 67 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H61-M LX3 Builds (Compare 360 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M LX3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $75
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback