Asrock H81M-VG4 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics1.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive14.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsrock H81M-VG4 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory2.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160316
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 28 '17 at 09:05
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3-$209
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
80.3% Excellent
Memory 92.9
1-Core 112
2-Core 212
80% 139 Pts
4-Core 366
8-Core 570
58% 468 Pts
64-Core 572
35% 572 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
Nvidia(10DE 104A) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 267 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 378.49
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.93% Terrible
Lighting 2.37
Reflection 2.92
Parallax 0.62
2% 1.97 fps
MRender 3.05
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 1.91
2% 2.42 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.93%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshib DT01ACA100 1TB
434GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2O Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Read 137
Write 143
Mixed 99.8
28% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.48
4K Mixed 0.12
2% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 19%
Hitach HDP725050GLA360 500GB
247GB free
Firmware: GM4O Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
47.8% Average
Read 89.1
Write 77.6
Mixed 71.3
60% 79.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 1.38
4K Mixed 0.35
86% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Goodram GR1600D364L11S/4G 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
32.7% Below average
MC Read 11.6
MC Write 10.5
MC Mixed 8.4
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 9.6
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 62.3
64% 62.3 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-VG4 R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,331 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H81M-VG4 R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $222
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback