Asus CG8565

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemAsus CG8565  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK CG8565
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120104
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 18 '18 at 13:08
Run Duration226 Seconds
Run User MAC-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Memory 91.2
1-Core 91.8
2-Core 168
70% 117 Pts
4-Core 299
8-Core 412
45% 356 Pts
64-Core 447
28% 447 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST32000641AS 2TB-$159
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC13 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 113
Write 95.9
Mixed 69.7
69% 92.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.25
4K Write 1.09
4K Mixed 0.43
79% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 73%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
210GB free
Firmware: 0634
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
18.1% Very poor
Read 33.2
Write 29.6
Mixed 31.1
24% 31.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.29
4K Write 1.73
4K Mixed 0.33
81% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 66%
WD WD2500BEVS-22UST0 250GB
166GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
28.8% Poor
Read 53.8
Write 46.4
Mixed 49.2
38% 49.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 1.45
4K Mixed 0.32
78% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 32%
MUSHKIN MKNUFDVS8GB 8GB
4GB free, PID 5200
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Read 97.5
Write 12
Mixed 19
38% 42.8 MB/s
4K Read 7.89
4K Write 0.33
4K Mixed 0.03
42% 2.75 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SLA302G08-GGNHC 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
54.3% Above average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 19.5
MC Mixed 17.4
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 15.9
44% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 65.4
61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CG8565 Builds (Compare 47 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

System: Asus CG8565

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $530
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback