Intel DP67BG

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemINTEL_ BGP6710J
MotherboardIntel DP67BG  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120214
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 09 '16 at 23:37
Run Duration354 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.9% Very good
Memory 91.8
1-Core 93
2-Core 184
72% 123 Pts
4-Core 360
8-Core 360
48% 360 Pts
64-Core 359
22% 359 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6451
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
28.8% Poor
Lighting 36.4
Reflection 33.9
Parallax 30.4
30% 33.6 fps
MRender 35.8
Gravity 32
Splatting 32.2
27% 33.3 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 512GB-$129
329GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM06B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Read 521
Write 455
Mixed 421
104% 466 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 51.9
4K Mixed 21.5
97% 33.7 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 210
DQ Mixed 61.8
86% 157 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 118%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
805GB free
Firmware: CC46 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
61.7% Good
Read 108
Write 107
Mixed 70.9
71% 95.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.75
4K Write 1.38
4K Mixed 0.61
124% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 68%
Seagate ST3750330AS 750GB-$137
646GB free
Firmware: SD04 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
49.2% Average
Read 90.1
Write 81.2
Mixed 69.1
60% 80.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 1.57
4K Mixed 0.44
104% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 58%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
602GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 80.1
Write 77.4
Mixed 55.6
53% 71 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 2.18
4K Mixed 0.41
107% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 57%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
216GB free
Firmware: CC38 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
63.9% Good
Read 122
Write 101
Mixed 22
59% 81.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.85
4K Write 1.53
4K Mixed 0.56
126% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 68%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
89GB free
Firmware: CC38 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
53.3% Above average
Read 101
Write 84.8
Mixed 45.1
57% 76.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.84
4K Write 1.51
4K Mixed 0.33
99% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 68%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
45GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
63.9% Good
Read 117
Write 106
Mixed 36.9
63% 86.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.58
4K Write 1.57
4K Mixed 0.19
74% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 59%
MUSHKIN MKNUFDVS8GB 8GB
6GB free, PID 5200
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
8.99% Terrible
Read 33
Write 10.3
Mixed 13
20% 18.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.79
4K Write 0.27
4K Mixed 0.07
30% 1.71 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.99%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x393955353437312D3030312E4130304C4620 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
51.3% Above average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 16.3
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 16.1
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 64.4
62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical DP67BG Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Intel DP67BG - $165

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $464
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback