Asus H87-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics18.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H87-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141015
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 06 '18 at 22:51
Run Duration286 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$65
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Memory 91.7
1-Core 105
2-Core 210
78% 136 Pts
4-Core 376
8-Core 570
59% 473 Pts
64-Core 579
36% 579 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Gigabyte(1458 3667) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 390.77
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
18.5% Very poor
Lighting 23.3
Reflection 17.4
Parallax 20.7
19% 20.5 fps
MRender 25.8
Gravity 23.7
Splatting 17
18% 22.2 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ST1000DM003-1CH162 240GB
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 600ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
46.6% Average
Read 320
Write 168
Mixed 242
54% 243 MB/s
4K Read 11.8
4K Write 83.9
4K Mixed 8.58
73% 34.8 MB/s
DQ Read 24.4
DQ Write 93.7
DQ Mixed 8.94
21% 42.4 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 98%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
777GB free
Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 199
Write 174
Mixed 146
129% 173 MB/s
4K Read 0.34
4K Write 1.19
4K Mixed 0.24
63% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 107%
Great: 114%
Kingston SV300S37A240G 1TB
369GB free
Firmware: CC46 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
Read 174
Write 150
Mixed 138
116% 154 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 1.18
4K Mixed 0.28
78% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 98%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB
322GB free
Firmware: JA0OA560 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
48.1% Average
Read 84.1
Write 83.5
Mixed 83.8
63% 83.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 1.34
4K Mixed 0.19
62% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 57%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
277GB free
Firmware: JC45
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Read 35.8
Write 10.5
Mixed 13.3
15% 19.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.01
4K Write 0.003
4K Mixed 0.01
2% 0.009 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
58.9% Above average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 18.2
58% 20.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 17.7
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 64.6
62% 64.6 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H87-PLUS Builds (Compare 859 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H87-PLUS - $128

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $288
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback