Asus H87M-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics37.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive95.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus H87M-E  (all builds)
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display5760 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131202
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 31 '18 at 19:16
Run Duration276 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$65
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Memory 92.4
1-Core 113
2-Core 223
82% 143 Pts
4-Core 407
8-Core 587
62% 497 Pts
64-Core 588
36% 588 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Gigabyte(1458 36AC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.31
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
37.7% Below average
Lighting 49.8
Reflection 46.1
Parallax 41.4
41% 45.8 fps
MRender 38.6
Gravity 41.6
Splatting 37.8
32% 39.3 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
2GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
Read 490
Write 345
Mixed 327
86% 387 MB/s
4K Read 49.3
4K Write 90.9
4K Mixed 24
154% 54.7 MB/s
DQ Read 357
DQ Write 88.5
DQ Mixed 59.6
86% 168 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 108%
Schijfstation 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
86% Excellent
Read 160
Write 139
Mixed 133
108% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.79
4K Write 2.34
4K Mixed 0.26
106% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 86%
Great: 86%
Generic Flash Disk 8GB
0GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
4.82% Terrible
Read 16.9
Write 5.29
Mixed 5.35
9% 9.16 MB/s
4K Read 5.11
4K Write 0.005
4K Mixed 0.005
19% 1.71 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.82%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5584-003.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
57.8% Above average
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 16.8
57% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 20.5
SC Mixed 17.9
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 63.3
63% 63.3 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H87M-E Builds (Compare 863 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H87M-E - $129

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback