MSI P55-CD53 (MS-7586)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics60.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive46.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7586
MotherboardMSI P55-CD53 (MS-7586)  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110303
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 29 '22 at 22:55
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$320
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Memory 96.7
1-Core 78.2
2-Core 144
66% 106 Pts
4-Core 281
8-Core 378
42% 330 Pts
64-Core 364
22% 364 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 473.62
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
60.8% Good
Lighting 75.5
Reflection 86.2
Parallax 76.1
62% 79.3 fps
MRender 77.4
Gravity 74.6
Splatting 67.5
59% 73.2 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$235
703GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 84 80 76 72 66 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
46.6% Average
Read 235
Write 230
Mixed 194
SusWrite 71.5
41% 182 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 49.7
4K Mixed 29.4
99% 34 MB/s
DQ Read 26.7
DQ Write 60.1
DQ Mixed 30
27% 38.9 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 133%
Schijfstation 2TB
705GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 87 87 87 87 87 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
49.3% Average
Read 90.5
Write 89.2
Mixed 73.2
SusWrite 80.9
62% 83.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
160% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
1716, 1716, 1716, 1716 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
49% Average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 15.3
48% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 11.1
SC Mixed 12.8
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 51.4
78% 51.4 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 49%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P55-CD53 (MS-7586) Builds (Compare 193 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI P55-CD53 (MS-7586)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $189
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback