| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 4.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
| System | HP Z400 Workstation (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 0B4Ch |
| Memory | 5 GB free of 6.00195 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 8.1 |
| BIOS Date | 20160224 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 25 '18 at 10:46 |
| Run Duration | 87 Seconds |
| Run User | AUT-User |
| Background CPU | 5% |
PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon W3520-$230
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
|
63.4%
Good
|
52% 85.2 Pts
|
39% 306 Pts
|
21% 344 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD Radeon HD 5570
HP(103C 6870) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
|
4.67%
Terrible
|
5% 5.94 fps
|
4% 5.03 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
102%
Outstanding
|
129% 171 MB/s
|
194% 2.09 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown ID:80 2C 9JSF12872AZ-1G4G1 ID:80 2C 9JSF12872AZ-1G4G1 ID:80 2C 9JSF12872AZ-1G4G1 ID:80 2C 9JSF12872AZ-1G4G1 ID:80 2C 9JSF12872AZ-1G4G1 ID:80 2C 9JSF12872AZ-1G4G1 40GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 34816 MB
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
42.4%
Average
|
42% 14.8 GB/s
|
32% 11.3 GB/s
|
48% 83.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Z400 Workstation Builds (Compare 3,326 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP Z400 Workstation
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Xeon W3520Intel $230Bench 63%, 6,508 samples | 569x |
| Xeon W3550IntelBench 66%, 7,649 samples | 536x |
| Xeon W3565IntelBench 67%, 7,121 samples | 489x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 273x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 156x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 137x |
| SSD |
|
|---|---|
| A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples | 136x |
| 850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples | 73x |
| A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples | 66x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $258 |