Today's hottest deals

Asrock P67 Pro3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics37.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock P67 Pro3  (all builds)
Memory1.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131001
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJun 25 '22 at 17:47
Run Duration310 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 20%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$150
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
48.6% Average
Memory 73
1-Core 43.9
2-Core 79.2
43% 65.4 Pts
4-Core 136
8-Core 180
20% 158 Pts
64-Core 202
12% 202 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$170
CLim: 1268 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.3.1
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
37.5% Below average
Lighting 44
Reflection 56.7
Parallax 64.8
36% 55.2 fps
MRender 57.3
Gravity 52.7
Splatting 42
41% 50.7 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD VelociRaptor 500GB-$70
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 04.06A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 29 66 69 67 61 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
61.3% Good
Read 161
Write 161
Mixed 96
SusWrite 52.4
87% 118 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.3
244% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 113%
Seagate ST3250820AS 250GB-$58
17GB free
Firmware: 3.AAD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 69 67 70 70 68 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
38.9% Below average
Read 66.9
Write 34.3
Mixed 41.3
SusWrite 68.5
39% 52.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
153% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 44%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
60GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 135 135 131 133 137 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
65.2% Good
Read 92.7
Write 96.8
Mixed 68.8
SusWrite 134
72% 98.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
180% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 85%
Hitachi HCC545050A7E630 500GB
4GB free
Firmware: GR2OA310
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 24 40 42 38 36 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
23.7% Poor
Read 48.5
Write 51.1
Mixed 15.2
SusWrite 33.8
27% 37.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
103% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 60%
WD WD10JUCX-63WPNY0 1TB
81GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 47 69 69 68 62 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
35.5% Below average
Read 63.2
Write 58.7
Mixed 34.9
SusWrite 60.3
40% 54.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
154% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 64%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB
1GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.1 3.8 3.2 3.6 3.7 3.6 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
11.3% Very poor
Read 29.6
Write 11.5
Mixed 13.2
SusWrite 3.5
16% 14.4 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 2.5
158% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 13%
4GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.4 3.5 2.5 3.6 3.6 4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
2.41% Terrible
Read 8.7
Write 1.2
Mixed 1.8
SusWrite 3.3
4% 3.75 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
7% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.41%
Great: 8%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 16GB
2GB free, PID a815
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 6.2 6.1 6.3 6.2 6.2 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
5.23% Terrible
Read 20
Write 0.5
Mixed 4.7
SusWrite 5.8
8% 7.75 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
17% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.23%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend JM1600KLH-4G 04CD F3-12800CL9-2GBNQ 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
26% Poor
MC Read 8.7
MC Write 8.6
MC Mixed 7.8
24% 8.37 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 8.5
24% 8.4 GB/s
Latency 94.5
42% 94.5 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 26%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P67 Pro3 Builds (Compare 546 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock P67 Pro3 - $115

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $602
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback