Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics26.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive87.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-970A-DS3P  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 14 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160226
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJul 16 '21 at 09:08
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-4170 Quad-Core-$81
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Memory 80
1-Core 74.6
2-Core 143
60% 99.1 Pts
4-Core 206
8-Core 230
28% 218 Pts
64-Core 212
13% 212 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.4% Poor
Lighting 33.1
Reflection 34.4
Parallax 33.1
27% 33.5 fps
MRender 38
Gravity 34.1
Splatting 23.6
25% 31.9 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Tcsunbow X3 120GB
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0526A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 287 149 152 153 154 154 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Read 422
Write 372
Mixed 344
SusWrite 175
74% 328 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 76.2
4K Mixed 48.1
155% 53.2 MB/s
DQ Read 281
DQ Write 242
DQ Mixed 120
129% 214 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 112%
Seagate ST500LM012 HN-M500MBB 500GB
461GB free
Firmware: 2AR10002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 71 72 72 71 72 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
36.9% Below average
Read 63.3
Write 42
Mixed 39.6
SusWrite 65.2
39% 52.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
120% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 59%
Hitachi HCC545050A7E630 500GB
465GB free
Firmware: GR2OA3N0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 109 108 109 109 108 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
59.7% Above average
Read 100
Write 107
Mixed 21.9
SusWrite 108
61% 84.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 60%
WD Blue 2.5" 750GB (2010)-$55
675GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 71 72 71 71 72 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
49% Average
Read 105
Write 109
Mixed 53.1
SusWrite 65.3
61% 83.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 49%
Great: 54%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$14
7GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 18 18 7.2 18 14 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 46.6
Write 35.7
Mixed 18.5
SusWrite 14.4
35% 28.8 MB/s
4K Read 8.9
4K Write 0
50% 4.45 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMR1870EC58E9 Samsung M378B5673FH0- RMR1870EC58E9 Corsair CMZ4GX3M1A160 14GB
667, 667, 667, 667 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.2% Average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 13.3
MC Mixed 15
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 12.4
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 80.4
50% 80.4 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 27" 1280 720 VSCF931 VX2757
Typical GA-970A-DS3P Builds (Compare 3,276 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3P - $149

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $318
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback