PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 27.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 34.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER (all builds) |
Memory | 20 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20150427 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Apr 12 '21 at 19:26 |
Run Duration | 191 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 10% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-4690K-$54
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
|
53.2%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 85CD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.92
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
27.8%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Tcsunbow X3 120GB
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0327B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 150 234 26 139 171 MB/s
|
34.6%
Below average
|
|||
Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 240GB
223GB free
Firmware: ECFM12.5 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 406 451 488 542 548 MB/s
|
120%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$15
174GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 75 78 82 85 87 MB/s
|
43.9%
Average
|
|||
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
653GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 100 106 110 111 113 MB/s
|
60.5%
Good
|
|||
Generic USB SD Reader 8GB
2GB free, PID 6332
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.7 9.8 10 11 11 11 MB/s
|
4.67%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1600C10D3/8G KHX1600C9D3/4GX 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
|
44.2%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples | 1,699x |
Core i5-4690KIntel $54Bench 70%, 229,359 samples | 478x |
Core i7-4790Intel $115Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 234x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 431x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $200Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 242x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 164x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 60% - Above average | Total price: $930 |