Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-B550 UD AC-Y1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 120%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive284% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B550 UD AC-Y1  (all builds)
Memory58.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230608
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateOct 21 '24 at 04:49
Run Duration564 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X-$152
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Memory 88.6
1-Core 171
2-Core 343
107% 201 Pts
4-Core 682
8-Core 1,241
115% 962 Pts
64-Core 1,533
95% 1,533 Pts
Poor: 85%
This bench: 108%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$282
Device(1B4C 1522) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2317 MHz, MLim: 3850 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 565.90
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Lighting 144
Reflection 131
Parallax 137
118% 138 fps
MRender 147
Gravity 112
Splatting 98.1
95% 119 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 108%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sabrent SB-ROCKET-NVMe4-1TB 1TB
736GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT4B5.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2319 493 407 387 494 494 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
284% Outstanding
Read 1,928
Write 3,330
Mixed 2,316
SusWrite 766
472% 2,085 MB/s
4K Read 51.5
4K Write 233
4K Mixed 90.6
317% 125 MB/s
DQ Read 1,675
DQ Write 1,094
DQ Mixed 1,341
1,012% 1,370 MB/s
Poor: 184%
This bench: 284%
Great: 477%
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 1TB
475GB free
Firmware: VB421D70 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1228 1270 1269 1269 1269 1251 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
271% Outstanding
Read 2,448
Write 1,277
Mixed 1,286
SusWrite 1,259
348% 1,568 MB/s
4K Read 36.2
4K Write 166
4K Mixed 55.3
214% 85.8 MB/s
DQ Read 674
DQ Write 706
DQ Mixed 887
613% 756 MB/s
Poor: 145%
This bench: 271%
Great: 310%
Fikwot F X815 1TB
954GB free
Firmware: 2501
SusWrite @10s intervals: 330 321 316 316 315 311 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
71.4% Very good
Read 376
Write 345
Mixed 338
SusWrite 318
78% 344 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 35.8
4K Mixed 25.1
91% 29.1 MB/s
DQ Read 225
DQ Write 173
DQ Mixed 200
149% 199 MB/s
SSK 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 4103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 357 357 358 357 358 358 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Read 392
Write 363
Mixed 348
SusWrite 358
82% 365 MB/s
4K Read 36.7
4K Write 50.4
4K Mixed 38.2
131% 41.8 MB/s
DQ Read 240
DQ Write 225
DQ Mixed 249
182% 238 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 93%
Fikwot F X991 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 1.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 411 411 411 409 409 409 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
77.9% Very good
Read 225
Write 410
Mixed 254
SusWrite 410
74% 325 MB/s
4K Read 37.7
4K Write 37.7
4K Mixed 34
121% 36.5 MB/s
DQ Read 182
DQ Write 116
DQ Mixed 174
123% 157 MB/s
SSK 1TB
120GB free
Firmware: 4103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 467 460 455 454 455 452 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 49% Great: 90%
SSK Storage 1TB
172GB free
Firmware: 1.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 481 499 503 504 503 506 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 47% Great: 79%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
347GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 370 370 370 370 370 369 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
76.2% Very good
Read 395
Write 375
Mixed 353
SusWrite 370
84% 373 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 39
4K Mixed 30.9
100% 31.9 MB/s
DQ Read 165
DQ Write 133
DQ Mixed 93.2
85% 130 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 133%
SSK 1TB
927GB free
Firmware: 0212
SusWrite @10s intervals: 736 733 729 730 729 730 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 54% Great: 93%
HGST HUH 721010ALE600 10TB
1TB free, PID a578
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 45 45 45 45 48 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
52.9% Above average
Read 168
Write 175
Mixed 117
SusWrite 45
163% 126 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 5.9
4K Mixed 1.3
254% 3.27 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 53%
HUH72808 0ALE601 8TB
3TB free, PID a578
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 45 46 45 45 45 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
42% Average
Read 128
Write 167
Mixed 69
SusWrite 44.5
134% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 1
187% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 42%
Great: 50%
HGST HUH 721010ALE600 10TB
2.5TB free, PID a578
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 45 46 45 45 45 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 184
Write 191
Mixed 122
SusWrite 44.4
174% 135 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 1.2
259% 3.37 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 53%
HGST HUH 721010ALE600 10TB
2.5TB free, PID a578
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 45 46 45 45 45 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Read 203
Write 217
Mixed 120
SusWrite 44.5
187% 146 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 5.9
4K Mixed 1.2
252% 3.27 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 53%
HGST HUH 721010ALE604 10TB
5.5TB free, PID a578
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 45 46 45 45 45 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
66.8% Good
Read 197
Write 207
Mixed 130
SusWrite 44.4
186% 145 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 9.1
4K Mixed 0.7
343% 4.17 MB/s
DQ Read 0.6
DQ Write 5.1
DQ Mixed 1.1
213% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 42.2
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 40.7
105% 36.6 GB/s
SC Read 32.8
SC Write 26.8
SC Mixed 45.7
100% 35.1 GB/s
Latency 69
58% 69 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 104%
Great: 135%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 36.1" 1280 720 INS4303 NS43DF710NA21
Typical GA-B550 UD AC-Y1 Builds (Compare 191 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B550 UD AC-Y1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $406
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback