Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 4157FH5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics13.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 4157FH5  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LENOVO
Memory9.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100729
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 17 '18 at 07:01
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W3550
1366-pin LGA, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
69.5% Good
Memory 90.3
1-Core 84.3
2-Core 162
68% 112 Pts
4-Core 264
8-Core 417
42% 340 Pts
64-Core 409
25% 409 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 460-$203
EVGA(3842 1370) 1GB
CLim: 720 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Lighting 15.3
Reflection 17.9
Parallax 13.6
12% 15.6 fps
MRender 21.6
Gravity 15.6
Splatting 17.9
15% 18.4 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$46
445GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
48.2% Average
Read 89.7
Write 77.8
Mixed 88.1
64% 85.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 1.93
4K Mixed 0.41
109% 1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 69%
Lacie RuggedKey USB 3.0 16GB-$25
11GB free, PID 1064
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Read 33
Write 17.3
Mixed 14.7
24% 21.7 MB/s
4K Read 3.69
4K Write 0.35
4K Mixed 0.29
35% 1.44 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x4GB
3 of 6 slots used
12GB DIMM 15h Reserved 1066 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
45.6% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 12.3
MC Mixed 17.5
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 11.7
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 66.8
60% 66.8 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 4157FH5 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Lenovo 4157FH5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $90
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback