Today's hottest deals

Wortmann_ag TERRA_PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics11% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive39.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemWortmann_ag TERRA_PC  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte H81M-D2W
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151005
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 25 '22 at 09:13
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4170-$37
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Memory 69.5
1-Core 91.6
2-Core 170
63% 110 Pts
4-Core 223
8-Core 238
30% 230 Pts
64-Core 234
14% 234 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 460-$203
Sapphire(174B 4600) 1GB
CLim: 650 MHz, MLim: 850 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
11% Very poor
Lighting 12.5
Reflection 17.5
Parallax 12.6
10% 14.2 fps
MRender 19.8
Gravity 14
Splatting 13
12% 15.6 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Netac 128GB 128GB
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1A30F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 351 320 306 92 101 182 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
39.8% Below average
Read 477
Write 365
Mixed 244
SusWrite 225
73% 328 MB/s
4K Read 11.4
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 4.1
24% 6.03 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 82%
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44
122GB free
Firmware: 1AC01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 88 89 89 88 87 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
48.8% Average
Read 81.4
Write 91
Mixed 58.9
SusWrite 88.3
59% 79.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BA160BJ.M8F Hynix HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
52.6% Above average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 16.6
53% 18.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 16.3
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TERRA_PC Builds (Compare 2,501 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: Wortmann_ag TERRA_PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $188
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback