Dell Latitude 2100

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 15%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Dell Latitude 2100 (all builds)
Motherboard	Dell 0W785N
Memory	1 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display	1024 x 600 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 600 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090811
Uptime	231 Days
Run Date	Jan 13 '18 at 23:39
Run Duration	241 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	99%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom N270 3,302 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Microprocessor, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	15% Very poor	Memory 28.7 1-Core 4.4 2-Core 6.8 11% 13.3 Pts	4-Core 8.6 8-Core 9.9 1% 9.25 Pts	64-Core 9.5 1% 9.5 Pts
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 15% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2009)-$71 42,987 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 285GB free (System drive) Firmware: 11.01A11 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 190 187 1466 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1177 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 368 (0A) Spinup retry count 99 99 3 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 147 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 16 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 195 195 16689 (C2) HDA temperature 111 97 36 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	32.5% Below average	Read 56.4 Write 56.5 Mixed 51.2 41% 54.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.45 4K Write 1.53 4K Mixed 0.28 78% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 32.5% Great: 41%
Generic- Multi-Card 64GB 369 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 59GB free, PID 0158 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	9.66% Terrible	Read 18.8 Write 14.2 Mixed 16.8 21% 16.6 MB/s	4K Read 2.98 4K Write 1.02 4K Mixed 0.85 75% 1.62 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 9.66% Great: 17%
Leef Supra 32GB 68 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 19GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	9.81% Terrible	Read 28.3 Write 10.6 Mixed 17.5 21% 18.8 MB/s	4K Read 2.7 4K Write 0.89 4K Mixed 0.55 59% 1.38 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 9.81% Great: 36%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2GB 9,823 User benchmarks, average bench 15% null MHz 1024, 1024 MB Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	7.1% Terrible	MC Read 2.7 MC Write 2.5 MC Mixed 2 7% 2.4 GB/s	SC Read 0.5 SC Write 2.3 SC Mixed 0.7 3% 1.17 GB/s	Latency 262 15% 262 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.1% Great: 27%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Dell Latitude 2100

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)