Today's hottest deals

Asus 1005HA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive12.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (96%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus 1005HA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK 1005HA
Memory0.8 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 600 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110418
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 03 '21 at 15:44
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 96%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom N270
PBGA 437, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
33.1% Below average
Memory 65.2
1-Core 3.9
2-Core 9.5
24% 26.2 Pts
4-Core 9.1
8-Core 10.4
1% 9.75 Pts
64-Core 11.5
1% 11.5 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 250GB-$239
120GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 31 31 31 31 31 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
12.6% Very poor
Read 98.2
Write 24.4
Mixed 49.3
SusWrite 30.5
11% 50.6 MB/s
4K Read 14.9
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.6
25% 5.77 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 85%
Kingston DTR30G2 64GB
50GB free, PID 16a2
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 21 21 21 21 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
8.56% Terrible
Read 20.8
Write 17.3
Mixed 15.2
SusWrite 19.9
24% 18.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.5
32% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 8.56%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 1 slots used
2GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
9.31% Terrible
MC Read 3.3
MC Write 2.7
MC Mixed 2.2
8% 2.73 GB/s
SC Read 0.7
SC Write 1.8
SC Mixed 0.7
3% 1.07 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.31%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback