Today's hottest deals

Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X513UA_M513UA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics9.61% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive92% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X513UA_M513UA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X513UA
Memory6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230509
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 28 '24 at 14:29
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
44.9% Average
Memory 51.3
1-Core 56
2-Core 102
41% 69.8 Pts
4-Core 207
8-Core 378
35% 292 Pts
64-Core 652
40% 652 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Asus(1043 17C2) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 30.0.13044.14002
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
9.61% Terrible
Lighting 8.5
Reflection 15
Parallax 22.4
7% 15.3 fps
MRender 12.4
Gravity 20.2
Splatting 20.4
15% 17.7 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.61%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GB
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 337 108 111 32 21 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
92% Outstanding
Read 1075
Write 928
Mixed 830
SusWrite 105
164% 734 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 29.7
4K Mixed 26.3
87% 26.8 MB/s
DQ Read 436
DQ Write 270
DQ Mixed 365
269% 357 MB/s
Poor: 99%
This bench: 92%
Great: 290%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron Hynix HMA81GS6DJR8N-XN 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
47.8% Average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 17.7
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 15
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 154
26% 154 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 47 17 60 15.5" 1920 1057 SDC4161
Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X513UA_M513UA Builds (Compare 462 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X513UA_M513UA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback