Today's hottest deals

HC HCAR5000-MI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics15.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive205% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
9 months ago, 8 months ago.
SystemHC HCAR5000-MI  (all builds)
MotherboardHC HCAR5000-MI
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230621
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 03 '24 at 20:33
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
86.3% Excellent
Memory 75.2
1-Core 143
2-Core 283
90% 167 Pts
4-Core 523
8-Core 797
82% 660 Pts
64-Core 970
60% 970 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
AMD(1002 0123) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 31.0.12027.9001
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Lighting 18.3
Reflection 18.7
Parallax 27.4
15% 21.5 fps
MRender 15
Gravity 22.6
Splatting 21.4
16% 19.7 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
KPART512GBC2DVT 512GB
417GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW000003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1158 564 564 528 512 480 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
205% Outstanding
Read 1,799
Write 1,840
Mixed 1109
SusWrite 634
301% 1,345 MB/s
4K Read 39.1
4K Write 85.7
4K Mixed 53.2
173% 59.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,112
DQ Write 714
DQ Mixed 779
617% 868 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 205%
Great: 263%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown LD4S08G32C22ST 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
MC Read 32.3
MC Write 29
MC Mixed 27.5
85% 29.6 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 37.7
SC Mixed 25.1
80% 28.1 GB/s
Latency 92.2
43% 92.2 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 75 19.5" 1280 720 SPT080D Sceptre E20
Typical HCAR5000-MI Builds (Compare 59 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

System: HC HCAR5000-MI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback