Today's hottest deals

MSI B550M PRO-VDH (MS-7C95)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics71.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C95
MotherboardMSI B550M PRO-VDH (MS-7C95)  (all builds)
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220517
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 17 '24 at 13:54
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$158
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Memory 91
1-Core 175
2-Core 347
109% 204 Pts
4-Core 587
8-Core 1,057
99% 822 Pts
64-Core 1,509
93% 1,509 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 100%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$218
Nvidia(10DE 13D3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
71.4% Very good
Lighting 88.5
Reflection 88.4
Parallax 81.6
72% 86.2 fps
MRender 113
Gravity 79.5
Splatting 71.4
70% 87.9 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$80
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,588
Write 1,478
Mixed 1,572
414% 1,879 MB/s
4K Read 70.9
4K Write 169
4K Mixed 94.2
318% 111 MB/s
DQ Read 1,414
DQ Write 1,144
DQ Mixed 1,252
944% 1,270 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 346%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$98
199GB free
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 483 414 432 464 464 413 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
137% Outstanding
Read 519
Write 496
Mixed 480
SusWrite 445
109% 485 MB/s
4K Read 50.1
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 69.1
230% 81.2 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 373
280% 374 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 137%
Great: 137%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$98
106GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 483 415 483 488 483 480 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
138% Outstanding
Read 519
Write 496
Mixed 464
SusWrite 472
110% 488 MB/s
4K Read 50.3
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 69.1
230% 81 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 372
280% 374 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 138%
Great: 137%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$33
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
MC Read 38.2
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 33.1
91% 31.8 GB/s
SC Read 30
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 36.4
86% 30.1 GB/s
Latency 62.3
64% 62.3 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 48: 0P 5R 6G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
48% 16% 100 218 60 120 27" 1280 720 AOC2702 27G2G4
Typical B550M PRO-VDH (MS-7C95) Builds (Compare 1,284 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI B550M PRO-VDH (MS-7C95)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $534
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback