Today's hottest deals

Asus Z97-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics15.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus Z97-K  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141104
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 08 '23 at 13:26
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Memory 82.5
1-Core 108
2-Core 211
76% 134 Pts
4-Core 356
8-Core 592
58% 474 Pts
64-Core 579
36% 579 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 470
Asus(1043 8347) 1.2GB
CLim: 607 MHz, MLim: 837 MHz, Ram: 1.2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Lighting 17.5
Reflection 30.4
Parallax 20.8
14% 22.9 fps
MRender 30.3
Gravity 14.9
Splatting 19.8
17% 21.7 fps
Poor: 14%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 512GB
416GB free (System drive)
Firmware: W0203A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 393 396 407 426 429 431 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
79% Very good
Read 371
Write 337
Mixed 334
SusWrite 414
82% 364 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 74.8
4K Mixed 15.9
102% 39.4 MB/s
DQ Read 98.8
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 30.4
77% 153 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 79%
Great: 102%
Seagate ST5000LM000-2AN170 5TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 136 135 135 137 132 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
64.3% Good
Read 87.8
Write 105
Mixed 48.2
SusWrite 134
68% 93.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 6.4
4K Mixed 0.8
241% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 64%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0900
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 129 131 131 131 130 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
50.2% Above average
Read 138
Write 141
Mixed 20
SusWrite 130
140% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
35% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
31.5% Below average
MC Read 10.5
MC Write 10.9
MC Mixed 9
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 9.1
27% 9.37 GB/s
Latency 71.3
56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 26" 1280 720 XXX0000 CHHWJT
Typical Z97-K Builds (Compare 3,190 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-K - $147

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $795
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback