Today's hottest deals

Acer Extensa 215-33

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive222% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Extensa 215-33  (all builds)
MotherboardADN GardenPartyEX_ADN
Memory2.7 GB free of 8 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221222
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateDec 08 '23 at 09:54
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-N305
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
69.6% Good
Memory 62.5
1-Core 115
2-Core 220
72% 132 Pts
4-Core 412
8-Core 668
66% 540 Pts
64-Core 705
44% 705 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Acer(1025 1656) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4575
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
4.45% Terrible
Lighting 6.8
Reflection 10.5
Parallax 8.4
6% 8.57 fps
MRender 0.1
Gravity 9
Splatting 0.2
2% 3.1 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.45%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2450_MTFDKBA512TFK 512GB
429GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V5MA010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1825 2019 1811 1317 206 122 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
222% Outstanding
Read 1,366
Write 2,229
Mixed 1,204
SusWrite 1,216
340% 1,504 MB/s
4K Read 41.6
4K Write 96.4
4K Mixed 49.4
177% 62.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,125
DQ Write 604
DQ Mixed 853
637% 860 MB/s
Poor: 98%
This bench: 222%
Great: 307%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT62F1G32D4DR-031 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (97th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
78.8% Very good
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 31.1
MC Mixed 29.8
86% 30.1 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 21.1
51% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 21 0 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMN15E7
Typical Extensa 215-33 Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Extensa 215-33

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback