Today's hottest deals

Asus Vivobook Go E1504GAB_E1504GA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.34% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive158% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus Vivobook Go E1504GAB_E1504GA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK E1504GAB
Memory1.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230428
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateApr 30 '24 at 04:44
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-N305
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
70.6% Very good
Memory 64
1-Core 115
2-Core 224
73% 134 Pts
4-Core 415
8-Core 721
69% 568 Pts
64-Core 704
44% 704 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 3178) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4575
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
6.34% Terrible
Lighting 7.2
Reflection 8.1
Parallax 8.5
6% 7.93 fps
MRender 8.2
Gravity 10
Splatting 8.5
7% 8.9 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.34%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL4256HBJD-00BTW 256GB
173GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HXC70W1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 686 799 755 658 733 730 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
158% Outstanding
Read 1,184
Write 904
Mixed 883
SusWrite 727
207% 925 MB/s
4K Read 44.7
4K Write 63.2
4K Mixed 48.3
163% 52.1 MB/s
DQ Read 550
DQ Write 169
DQ Mixed 406
287% 375 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 158%
Great: 247%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44BB0-CWE 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
44.6% Average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 14.8
45% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 13.7
38% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 7 1 60 15.5" 1280 720 BOE0C02
Typical Vivobook Go E1504GAB_E1504GA Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus Vivobook Go E1504GAB_E1504GA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback