Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 134% UFO	Desktop 108% UFO	Workstation 159% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	125% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	350% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

5 months ago, 5 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	48 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20221028
Uptime	3.2 Days
Run Date	Dec 04 '23 at 07:15
Run Duration	545 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$416 33,026 User benchmarks, average bench 100% AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Memory 82.5 1-Core 176 2-Core 345 106% 201 Pts	4-Core 684 8-Core 1,349 120% 1,016 Pts	64-Core 2,678 166% 2,678 Pts
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 110%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-$293 48,534 User benchmarks, average bench 122% Gigabyte(1458 4107) CLim: 3195 MHz, MLim: 4325 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.17 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	125% Outstanding	Lighting 169 Reflection 119 Parallax 159 138% 149 fps	MRender 209 Gravity 133 Splatting 108 118% 150 fps
Poor: 115% ↑ This bench: 125% Great: 127%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$150 200,600 User benchmarks, average bench 336% 777GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1514 1595 1593 1596 1595 1599 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	350% Outstanding	Read 2,588 Write 1,859 Mixed 1,739 SusWrite 1,582 434% 1,942 MB/s	4K Read 65.8 4K Write 162 4K Mixed 91.6 303% 106 MB/s	DQ Read 1,384 DQ Write 1,126 DQ Mixed 1236 931% 1,249 MB/s
Poor: 223% ↑ This bench: 350% Great: 435%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$150 200,600 User benchmarks, average bench 336% 1TB free Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2447 2568 2573 1592 1434 1413 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	392% Outstanding	Read 2,712 Write 2,614 Mixed 2,053 SusWrite 2,004 527% 2,346 MB/s	4K Read 66.9 4K Write 185 4K Mixed 97.1 324% 116 MB/s	DQ Read 1,491 DQ Write 1,231 DQ Mixed 1,332 1,006% 1,351 MB/s
Poor: 223% ↑ This bench: 392% Great: 435%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$105 129,044 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 930GB free Firmware: SVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 414 454 455 459 459 459 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	114% Outstanding	Read 506 Write 452 Mixed 442 SusWrite 450 104% 463 MB/s	4K Read 43.5 4K Write 85 4K Mixed 56.4 183% 61.6 MB/s	DQ Read 224 DQ Write 185 DQ Mixed 202 152% 204 MB/s
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 137%
Seagate ST8000VN004-2M2101 8TB 135 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 30GB free Firmware: SC60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 108 115 112 120 116 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	75.4% Very good	Read 146 Write 151 Mixed 88.6 SusWrite 115 92% 125 MB/s	4K Read 2.3 4K Write 5.9 4K Mixed 1.4 361% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 75.4% Great: 113%
Seagate ST8000VN004-2M2101 8TB 135 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 4GB free Firmware: SC60 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 218 Write 217 Mixed 129 139% 188 MB/s	4K Read 42.2 4K Write 5.3 4K Mixed 1.3 2,001% 16.3 MB/s
Poor: 18% Great: 113%
WD easystore 264D 14TB 1,761 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 64GB free, PID 264d Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 93 100 106 104 102 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	81.7% Excellent	Read 194 Write 196 Mixed 157 SusWrite 101 215% 162 MB/s	4K Read 8.3 4K Write 9.6 4K Mixed 2.4 439% 6.77 MB/s	DQ Read 2.4 DQ Write 9.7 DQ Mixed 2.2 414% 4.77 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 81.7% Great: 107%
External USB3.0 16TB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 1GB free, PID 0578 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 122 Write 114 Mixed 74.8 128% 104 MB/s	4K Read 9.2 4K Write 4 4K Mixed 0.9 201% 4.7 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 134%
External USB3.0 16TB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2GB free, PID 0578 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 225 Write 214 Mixed 159 249% 199 MB/s	4K Read 25.8 4K Write 14.3 4K Mixed 1.6 636% 13.9 MB/s	DQ Read 4.8 DQ Write 9.8 DQ Mixed 1.3 395% 5.3 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 134%
External USB3.0 16TB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2GB free, PID 0578 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 186 Write 187 Mixed 146 220% 173 MB/s	4K Read 24.1 4K Write 13.2 4K Mixed 1.3 583% 12.9 MB/s	DQ Read 3.7 DQ Write 9.9 DQ Mixed 1.3 395% 4.97 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 134%
External USB3.0 16TB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2GB free, PID 0578 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 182 Write 138 Mixed 155 197% 158 MB/s	4K Read 23.4 4K Write 12.7 4K Mixed 1 553% 12.4 MB/s	DQ Read 2 DQ Write 12.7 DQ Mixed 1.8 501% 5.5 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 134%
External USB3.0 16TB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 1GB free, PID 0578 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 110 Write 152 Mixed 139 180% 134 MB/s	4K Read 20.3 4K Write 14.4 4K Mixed 1 599% 11.9 MB/s	DQ Read 0.7 DQ Write 14.7 DQ Mixed 1.4 550% 5.6 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 134%
External USB3.0 18TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 109% 40GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 33 34 33 33 33 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	109% Outstanding	Read 233 Write 248 Mixed 210 SusWrite 31.8 236% 181 MB/s	4K Read 25.2 4K Write 20.3 4K Mixed 0.1 787% 15.2 MB/s	DQ Read 0.1 DQ Write 9.4 DQ Mixed 0.1 324% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 108% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 109%
External USB3.0 18TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 109% 39GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 33 34 33 32 33 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	96.4% Outstanding	Read 201 Write 200 Mixed 205 SusWrite 32.6 209% 160 MB/s	4K Read 25.8 4K Write 17.6 4K Mixed 0.9 725% 14.8 MB/s	DQ Read 0.4 DQ Write 8.9 DQ Mixed 0.1 308% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 108% ↑ This bench: 96.4% Great: 109%
External USB3.0 18TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 109% 39GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 33 34 33 33 33 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	111% Outstanding	Read 259 Write 245 Mixed 181 SusWrite 32.4 227% 179 MB/s	4K Read 25.9 4K Write 19.6 4K Mixed 0.1 766% 15.2 MB/s	DQ Read 0.1 DQ Write 9.4 DQ Mixed 0.1 324% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 108% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 109%
External USB3.0 18TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 109% 39GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 33 34 33 33 33 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	95.7% Outstanding	Read 181 Write 175 Mixed 220 SusWrite 32.7 202% 152 MB/s	4K Read 24.3 4K Write 18.4 4K Mixed 0.8 743% 14.5 MB/s	DQ Read 3.6 DQ Write 10.4 DQ Mixed 0.1 370% 4.7 MB/s
Poor: 108% ↑ This bench: 95.7% Great: 109%
External USB3.0 18TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 109% 40GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 33 34 33 33 33 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	84.1% Excellent	Read 142 Write 143 Mixed 199 SusWrite 32.7 174% 129 MB/s	4K Read 25.2 4K Write 16.4 4K Mixed 1 685% 14.2 MB/s	DQ Read 3.1 DQ Write 18.4 DQ Mixed 1.1 675% 7.53 MB/s
Poor: 108% ↑ This bench: 84.1% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 4x16GB 4,962 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	131% Outstanding	MC Read 65.5 MC Write 41.3 MC Mixed 42 142% 49.6 GB/s	SC Read 30.6 SC Write 26.3 SC Mixed 38 90% 31.6 GB/s	Latency 70.8 56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 131% Great: 130%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	60	165	31.5"	1280 720	GSM776F LG ULTRAGEAR

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,932 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $175

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $200Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	4,661x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $158Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	4,291x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $110Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	3,428x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	2,247x
RTX 3080Nvidia $899Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	2,084x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,473x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $86Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,841x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $106Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	1,107x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	868x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	772x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	729x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $128Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	646x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $1,000

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16