Acer Predator G6-710

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics4.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAcer Predator G6-710  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Predator G6-710
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20150921
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateDec 03 '23 at 21:20
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Memory 86.2
1-Core 122
2-Core 240
84% 149 Pts
4-Core 409
8-Core 580
62% 494 Pts
64-Core 583
36% 583 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Acer(1025 098D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
4.73% Terrible
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 8.2
Parallax 7.6
5% 7.43 fps
MRender 8.8
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 0.2
4% 5.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.73%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CV1-8B128 128GB
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: G871201
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 169 172 172 174 174 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Read 469
Write 176
Mixed 225
SusWrite 172
58% 260 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 76.9
4K Mixed 38.9
137% 48.8 MB/s
DQ Read 306
DQ Write 174
DQ Mixed 170
145% 217 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$49
2TB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 208 209 208 211 208 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 201
Write 171
Mixed 89.9
SusWrite 208
122% 168 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
127% 1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 117%
Great: 114%
SanDisk Ultra II 480GB
104GB free, PID 1068
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 332 303 304 302 304 305 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
201% Outstanding
Read 348
Write 377
Mixed 265
SusWrite 308
440% 325 MB/s
4K Read 18.6
4K Write 25.6
4K Mixed 21.3
1,664% 21.8 MB/s
DQ Read 21.2
DQ Write 38.3
DQ Mixed 25.4
2,245% 28.3 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 201%
Great: 201%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB
891GB free, PID ce17
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 40 40 39 40 40 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
17.9% Very poor
Read 38.7
Write 39.3
Mixed 34.3
SusWrite 39.8
52% 38 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
65% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17.9%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA451U6AFR8N-TF 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
57.1% Above average
MC Read 22
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 17.1
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 20.8
SC Mixed 19.2
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 71.3
56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 23" 1280 720 MED3687 MD 20889
Typical Predator G6-710 Builds (Compare 505 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

System: Acer Predator G6-710

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $448
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback