Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics70.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive300% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS IX CODE  (all builds)
Memory26.8 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime3.8 Days
Run DateNov 26 '23 at 10:55
Run Duration212 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700k VH
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Memory 88.6
1-Core 128
2-Core 238
86% 151 Pts
4-Core 408
8-Core 632
64% 520 Pts
64-Core 636
39% 636 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.40
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
70.8% Very good
Lighting 87
Reflection 97.9
Parallax 85.6
71% 90.2 fps
MRender 84.6
Gravity 86.3
Splatting 87.4
71% 86.1 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$169
923GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1912 1748 1719 1753 1784 1815 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
300% Outstanding
Read 2,190
Write 2,078
Mixed 2008
SusWrite 1,788
454% 2,016 MB/s
4K Read 53.7
4K Write 97.9
4K Mixed 70.3
223% 74 MB/s
DQ Read 893
DQ Write 586
DQ Mixed 775
568% 751 MB/s
Poor: 283%
This bench: 300%
Great: 526%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
381GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1600 1344 1279 1316 1281 1358 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
278% Outstanding
Read 2,224
Write 1,995
Mixed 1,768
SusWrite 1,363
412% 1,838 MB/s
4K Read 52.4
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 67.6
222% 75 MB/s
DQ Read 960
DQ Write 684
DQ Mixed 847
626% 830 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 278%
Great: 410%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 1TB
521GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 464 432 409 444 470 469 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 579
Write 475
Mixed 401
SusWrite 448
107% 476 MB/s
4K Read 37.2
4K Write 76.5
4K Mixed 42.3
151% 52 MB/s
DQ Read 410
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 335
260% 357 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 114%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH32GX4M2Z3200C16 CMH32GX4M2Z3200C16 CMU16GX4M2A2666C16 CMU16GX4M2A2666C16 48GB
2667, 2667, 2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 16384, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
58.9% Above average
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 18.5
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 21.8
SC Mixed 20.2
53% 18.7 GB/s
Latency 67.8
59% 67.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 65" 1280 720 PHL04C3 Philips FTV
Typical MAXIMUS IX CODE Builds (Compare 1,305 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE - $279

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Good Total price: $1,128
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback