Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

Performance Results


Gaming 74% Battleship	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 76% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	97.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	251% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus X99-A/USB 3.1 (all builds)
Memory	59.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180419
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 24 '19 at 21:51
Run Duration	280 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 1,130 User benchmarks, average bench 72% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	69.2% Good	Memory 80.1 1-Core 78.5 2-Core 157 62% 105 Pts	4-Core 314 8-Core 623 55% 468 Pts	64-Core 1,219 75% 1,219 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 69.2% Great: 79%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GTX 560-$180 23,273 User benchmarks, average bench 14% EVGA(3842 2069) 2GB CLim: 865 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	0.97% Terrible	Lighting 1.07 Reflection 1.15 Parallax 0.34 1% 0.85 fps	MRender 1.52 Gravity 1.07 Splatting 1.61 1% 1.4 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 0.97% Great: 15%
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Gigabyte(1458 3717) CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing below potential (21^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	97.9% Outstanding	Lighting 124 Reflection 144 Parallax 132 101% 133 fps	MRender 112 Gravity 119 Splatting 105 91% 112 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 97.9% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 EVO 500GB 1,156 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 345GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 2129 2134 1176 1159 1150 1148 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	251% Outstanding	Read 2,209 Write 1,995 Mixed 1320 SusWrite 1,483 393% 1,752 MB/s	4K Read 44.3 4K Write 86.5 4K Mixed 56.1 185% 62.3 MB/s	DQ Read 362 DQ Write 268 DQ Mixed 337 246% 322 MB/s
Poor: 225% ↑ This bench: 251% Great: 381%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 1TB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 185GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 120 105 140 264 178 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	69.6% Good	Read 418 Write 324 Mixed 298 SusWrite 173 68% 303 MB/s	4K Read 22.7 4K Write 58.2 4K Mixed 29.5 103% 36.8 MB/s	DQ Read 183 DQ Write 285 DQ Mixed 178 150% 215 MB/s
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 69.6% Great: 114%
Micron_M500_MTFDDAK960MAV 960GB 535 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 49GB free Firmware: MU05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 356 323 245 105 104 101 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	72.1% Very good	Read 396 Write 372 Mixed 303 SusWrite 206 72% 319 MB/s	4K Read 20.6 4K Write 60.3 4K Mixed 27.3 98% 36.1 MB/s	DQ Read 302 DQ Write 303 DQ Mixed 184 171% 263 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 98%
Samsung 850 EVO 250GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 137GB free Firmware: MN6OA580 SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 92 91 93 90 94 MB/s Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive		Read 67.2 Write 82.2 Mixed 50.7 SusWrite 91.7 16% 72.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 3% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 127%
Fusion-io ioScale 1.30TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 153GB free Firmware: 7.1.17 rev 116786 Public SusWrite @10s intervals: 595 599 631 668 662 661 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 85% Great: 94%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119 45,158 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1.5TB free Firmware: 1AQ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 88 87 88 88 88 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	50% Above average	Read 86.8 Write 36.5 Mixed 49.2 SusWrite 87.3 48% 64.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1 176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 50% Great: 72%
Seagate ST4000NC001-1FS168 4TB 999 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 2.5TB free Firmware: CN02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 158 157 159 159 157 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	89% Excellent	Read 153 Write 137 Mixed 70.2 SusWrite 157 94% 129 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 89% Great: 101%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4-2133C15-8GVR Crucial CT8G4DFD8213.C16FAD F4-2133C15-8GVR Crucial CT8G4DFD8213.C16FAR F4-2133C15-8GVR Crucial CT8G4DFD8213.C16FAD F4-2133C15-8GVR 64GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 121% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	120% Outstanding	MC Read 56.5 MC Write 44.6 MC Mixed 45.3 139% 48.8 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 14.2 SC Mixed 15.9 39% 13.7 GB/s	Latency 80.4 50% 80.4 ns
Poor: 120% ↑ This bench: 120% Great: 123%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-A/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 1,295 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 65%

Destroyer

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 57%

Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	765x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	196x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	91x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	118x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	115x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	109x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	87x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	51x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $139Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	40x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	43x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	27x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 4x8GBCorsair $140Bench 87%, 4,858 samples	26x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 94% - Outstanding

Total price: $357

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16