Gigabyte GA-B360M D3H GSM-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics81.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive75.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte B360M D3H GSM
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B360M D3H GSM-CF  (all builds)
Memory25.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211105
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 25 '23 at 01:14
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 40%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Memory 84.2
1-Core 124
2-Core 227
82% 145 Pts
4-Core 450
8-Core 708
71% 579 Pts
64-Core 935
58% 935 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.40
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
81.4% Excellent
Lighting 99.4
Reflection 114
Parallax 103
81% 105 fps
MRender 93.6
Gravity 104
Splatting 102
82% 99.8 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 143 138 167 157 186 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
75.6% Very good
Read 460
Write 130
Mixed 191
SusWrite 172
52% 238 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 70.7
4K Mixed 31.3
116% 42.4 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 123
DQ Mixed 152
138% 218 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 133%
Solidigm SSDPFKKW010X7 1TB
954GB free
Firmware: 001C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1577 1617 1692 1797 1782 1772 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
298% Outstanding
Read 2,373
Write 1,905
Mixed 1,854
SusWrite 1,706
440% 1,960 MB/s
4K Read 49.1
4K Write 98.6
4K Mixed 66.9
212% 71.5 MB/s
DQ Read 913
DQ Write 564
DQ Mixed 762
561% 746 MB/s
Poor: 304%
This bench: 298%
Great: 614%
Toshiba MK3275GSX 320GB
160GB free
Firmware: GT001M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 62 62 63 63 63 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
37.2% Below average
Read 66.9
Write 73.2
Mixed 18.1
SusWrite 62.6
40% 55.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 46%
Seagate Barracuda Desktop 5TB-$124
4.5TB free
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 162 165 164 164 164 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
68.8% Good
Read 74.1
Write 172
Mixed 32.4
SusWrite 164
80% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 7.7
4K Mixed 0.7
262% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$48
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 193 183 181 179 188 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Read 126
Write 160
Mixed 75.8
SusWrite 185
100% 137 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.8
212% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2E3200C16 029E CMK16GX4M2E3200C16 029E CMK16GX4M2D3600C18 029E CMK16GX4M2D3600C18 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
66.4% Good
MC Read 24.3
MC Write 26
MC Mixed 20.5
67% 23.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 25.7
SC Mixed 18.2
55% 19.2 GB/s
Latency 73.5
54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 100 27" 1280 720 AUS270E VG279QR
Typical GA-B360M D3H GSM-CF Builds (Compare 93 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B360M D3H GSM-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $365
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback