Asus P9X79 PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics55.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
8 years ago, 8 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P9X79 PRO  (all builds)
Memory9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121005
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 10 '16 at 17:55
Run Duration504 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3930K-$195
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Memory 84.2
1-Core 93.4
2-Core 182
70% 120 Pts
4-Core 330
8-Core 521
52% 425 Pts
64-Core 634
39% 634 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5906
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Lighting 68.9
Reflection 72.2
Parallax 63
56% 68 fps
MRender 74.4
Gravity 64.2
Splatting 60.8
54% 66.5 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 320 Series 160GB-$149
39GB free
Firmware: 4PC10362 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
42.9% Average
Read 256
Write 170
Mixed 197
46% 208 MB/s
4K Read 16.1
4K Write 32.2
4K Mixed 15.9
62% 21.4 MB/s
DQ Read 89
DQ Write 66
DQ Mixed 29.1
35% 61.4 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 51%
Adata SP900 256GB-$300
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.0.2a Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41.6% Average
Read 218
Write 157
Mixed 125
37% 166 MB/s
4K Read 16.5
4K Write 53.9
4K Mixed 12.8
70% 27.7 MB/s
DQ Read 17.6
DQ Write 104
DQ Mixed 8
22% 43.1 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 89%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$49
1TB free
Firmware: CC4C Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
79.1% Very good
Read 136
Write 140
Mixed 122
100% 133 MB/s
4K Read 1.06
4K Write 1.44
4K Mixed 0.38
113% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 114%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
1TB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
61.7% Good
Read 105
Write 110
Mixed 72.2
71% 95.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.17
68% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 107%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
821GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
49% Average
Read 86.6
Write 83.9
Mixed 71.7
61% 80.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 2.34
4K Mixed 0.36
106% 1.08 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 49%
Great: 51%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
587GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
62.4% Good
Read 115
Write 102
Mixed 106
81% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.77
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.35
113% 1.14 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 62%
WD My Book 1140 2TB
1TB free, PID 1140
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Read 30
Write 26.2
Mixed 18.9
31% 25 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 1.78
4K Mixed 0.22
70% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 49%
WD My Passport 0748 320GB
295GB free, PID 0748
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
13.4% Very poor
Read 25.1
Write 23
Mixed 18.8
28% 22.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.2
60% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 34%
WD My Book Elite 1TB
199GB free, PID 1111
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Read 24.2
Write 21.6
Mixed 19.1
27% 21.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.88
4K Mixed 0.33
78% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 20%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA332 1TB
187GB free, PID b157
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
12.4% Very poor
Read 22.8
Write 21.1
Mixed 5.39
19% 16.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.71
4K Write 1.42
4K Mixed 0.43
66% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 18%
WD My Passport 083C 996GB
171GB free, PID 083c
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
9.48% Terrible
Read 24.5
Write 21.4
Mixed 17.9
26% 21.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.37
4K Mixed 0.26
23% 0.38 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.48%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
MC Read 38.8
MC Write 36.3
MC Mixed 33.8
104% 36.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 12.4
SC Mixed 11.8
36% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P9X79 PRO Builds (Compare 1,425 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 PRO - $374

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $942
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback