Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME H310M-D R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics49.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive162% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
14 months ago, 13 months ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME H310M-D R2.0  (all builds)
Memory26.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200714
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 14 '23 at 10:35
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$115
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Memory 88.7
1-Core 117
2-Core 234
82% 146 Pts
4-Core 450
8-Core 614
67% 532 Pts
64-Core 650
40% 650 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 537.42
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.5% Average
Lighting 60.7
Reflection 66
Parallax 59.9
50% 62.2 fps
MRender 59
Gravity 62.1
Splatting 60
49% 60.4 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P5 Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$96
110GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P7CR402 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 655 663 640 681 693 686 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
162% Outstanding
Read 742
Write 670
Mixed 669
SusWrite 670
155% 688 MB/s
4K Read 43.4
4K Write 77.2
4K Mixed 55.7
178% 58.8 MB/s
DQ Read 848
DQ Write 742
DQ Mixed 891
642% 827 MB/s
Poor: 162%
This bench: 162%
Great: 463%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$102
296GB free
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 434 448 442 470 472 471 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 468
Write 440
Mixed 423
SusWrite 456
101% 447 MB/s
4K Read 38.4
4K Write 72
4K Mixed 50.7
161% 53.7 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 357
268% 358 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 113%
Great: 137%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix ERD4AB8B3Z2ABZZ01 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
MC Read 32.2
MC Write 35.2
MC Mixed 29.4
92% 32.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 35.1
SC Mixed 25.8
74% 25.9 GB/s
Latency 68.7
58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 59 60 72.3" 1280 720 GSM0001 LG TV SSCR2
Typical PRIME H310M-D R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,091 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H310M-D R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $167
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $78
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback