Asus Q170M-C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics78.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Q170M-C  (all builds)
Memory22.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20170710
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 10 '23 at 19:56
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 18%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$180
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Memory 85.4
1-Core 109
2-Core 212
77% 136 Pts
4-Core 366
8-Core 511
55% 438 Pts
64-Core 515
32% 515 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
EVGA(3842 6181) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
78.3% Very good
Lighting 104
Reflection 43.8
Parallax 42.4
85% 63.4 fps
MRender 7.4
Gravity 118
Splatting 101
66% 75.5 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 500GB-$90
421GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU03
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 371
Write 400
Mixed 292
79% 355 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 66.8
4K Mixed 32
114% 41.3 MB/s
DQ Read 145
DQ Write 296
DQ Mixed 158
138% 200 MB/s
Poor: 56% Great: 105%
SSK 128GB
14GB free
Firmware: 1507
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 5,435
Write 19
Mixed 40
1,310% 1,831 MB/s
4K Read 517
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 3.4
21,947% 174 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 63%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
3.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 139
Write 134
Mixed 87.6
89% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
184% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 46% Great: 100%
Samsung FIT USB 3.0 64GB-$25
24GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 40.9
Write 22.6
Mixed 24.8
34% 29.4 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 9.8
4K Mixed 2.1
425% 5.8 MB/s
DQ Read 7.1
DQ Write 11.6
DQ Mixed 2.4
502% 7.03 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2666C16/8G KHX2666C15D4/8G KHX2666C15D4/8G KHX2666C16/8G 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.1% Very good
MC Read 25
MC Write 28
MC Mixed 22.6
72% 25.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 27.8
SC Mixed 20.6
61% 21.4 GB/s
Latency 72.3
55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 144 23.8" 1280 720 GSM5BB2 LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical Q170M-C Builds (Compare 348 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus Q170M-C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $355
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback