Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Samsung 300E4A/300E5A/300E7A

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 51% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	45.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Samsung 300E4A/300E5A/300E7A (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG 300E4A/300E5A/300E7A
Memory	4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110905
Uptime	5.2 Days
Run Date	Jun 06 '22 at 17:54
Run Duration	161 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-2330M-$150 20,066 User benchmarks, average bench 47% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	52.8% Above average	Memory 81.2 1-Core 57 2-Core 104 52% 80.6 Pts	4-Core 146 8-Core 142 19% 144 Pts	64-Core 143 9% 143 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 52.8% Great: 55%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Sanyo(144D C606) 2GB Driver: Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	1.65% Terrible	Lighting 1.8 Reflection 2.3 Parallax 1.4 2% 1.83 fps	MRender 2.7 Gravity 2.3 Splatting 2.4 2% 2.47 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.65% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intenso Sata III 128GB 2,059 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 73GB free (System drive) Firmware: T1125A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 250 41 44 50 44 40 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	45.8% Average	Read 184 Write 352 Mixed 352 SusWrite 77.9 55% 241 MB/s	4K Read 16.9 4K Write 63 4K Mixed 18.2 82% 32.7 MB/s	DQ Read 160 DQ Write 243 DQ Mixed 1.1 57% 135 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 45.8% Great: 91%
TO Exter nal USB 3.0 1TB 3,447 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 508GB free Firmware: 0104 SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 12 11 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	10.6% Very poor	Read 24.8 Write 24.2 Mixed 24.4 SusWrite 11.3 16% 21.2 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1.1 203% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 10.6% Great: 81%
SSK 128GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 29GB free Firmware: 1507 SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	12.3% Very poor	Read 26.9 Write 25.6 Mixed 25.8 SusWrite 11.4 17% 22.4 MB/s	4K Read 6.6 4K Write 7.3 4K Mixed 6.6 1,144% 6.83 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.3% Great: 63%
PA25-64 64GB 49GB free, PID 6830 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.6 8.5 8.4 8.6 8.5 8.3 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	9.54% Terrible	Read 27.4 Write 14 Mixed 17.4 SusWrite 8.5 20% 16.8 MB/s	4K Read 4 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 1.5 96% 2.13 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 04CB AD73I1C1674EV 8GB 110 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	47% Average	MC Read 16.8 MC Write 17.4 MC Mixed 15.8 48% 16.7 GB/s	SC Read 12.3 SC Write 11.2 SC Mixed 12.1 34% 11.9 GB/s	Latency 78.4 51% 78.4 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 47% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 300E4A/300E5A/300E7A Builds (Compare 172 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung 300E4A/300E5A/300E7A

CPU
Core i5-2430MIntel $53Bench 50%, 41,461 samples	53x
Core i3-2330MIntel $150Bench 47%, 20,066 samples	49x
Core i5-2450MIntel $225Bench 49%, 51,836 samples	32x

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	104x
GeForce GT 520MXNvidiaBench 2%, 1,577 samples	29x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	27x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $25Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	10x
BX500 240GBCrucial $23Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	4x
Ultimate SU800 256GBAdata $73Bench 91%, 40,725 samples	3x

RAM
AD73I1C1674EV 1x4GBAdataBench 25%, 5,119 samples	17x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 18,713 samples	12x
M471B5273CM0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 871 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $78

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389