Samsung 300E4A/300E5A/300E7A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSamsung 300E4A/300E5A/300E7A  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG 300E4A/300E5A/300E7A
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110905
Uptime5.2 Days
Run DateJun 06 '22 at 17:54
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2330M-$150
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Memory 81.2
1-Core 57
2-Core 104
52% 80.6 Pts
4-Core 146
8-Core 142
19% 144 Pts
64-Core 143
9% 143 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C606) 2GB
Driver: Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
1.65% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 2.3
Parallax 1.4
2% 1.83 fps
MRender 2.7
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 2.4
2% 2.47 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.65%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intenso Sata III 128GB
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1125A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 250 41 44 50 44 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
45.8% Average
Read 184
Write 352
Mixed 352
SusWrite 77.9
55% 241 MB/s
4K Read 16.9
4K Write 63
4K Mixed 18.2
82% 32.7 MB/s
DQ Read 160
DQ Write 243
DQ Mixed 1.1
57% 135 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 91%
TO Exter nal USB 3.0 1TB
508GB free
Firmware: 0104
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 12 11 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
10.6% Very poor
Read 24.8
Write 24.2
Mixed 24.4
SusWrite 11.3
16% 21.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.1
203% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 81%
SSK 128GB
29GB free
Firmware: 1507
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
12.3% Very poor
Read 26.9
Write 25.6
Mixed 25.8
SusWrite 11.4
17% 22.4 MB/s
4K Read 6.6
4K Write 7.3
4K Mixed 6.6
1,144% 6.83 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 63%
PA25-64 64GB
49GB free, PID 6830
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.6 8.5 8.4 8.6 8.5 8.3 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
9.54% Terrible
Read 27.4
Write 14
Mixed 17.4
SusWrite 8.5
20% 16.8 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.5
96% 2.13 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 04CB AD73I1C1674EV 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
47% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 15.8
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 12.1
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 78.4
51% 78.4 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 47%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 300E4A/300E5A/300E7A Builds (Compare 171 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 300E4A/300E5A/300E7A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $81
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback