Today's hottest deals

MSI H510M-A PRO (MS-7D22)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics100% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive37.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
13 months ago, 12 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D22
MotherboardMSI H510M-A PRO (MS-7D22)  (all builds)
Memory22.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211221
Uptime15.1 Days
Run DateSep 28 '23 at 20:37
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-11900-$266
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Memory 75.5
1-Core 90.5
2-Core 181
66% 116 Pts
4-Core 351
8-Core 643
60% 497 Pts
64-Core 1,016
63% 1,016 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$280
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 536.40
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
100% Outstanding
Lighting 136
Reflection 121
Parallax 128
111% 128 fps
MRender 146
Gravity 106
Splatting 57.5
79% 103 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 100%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD_2.5"_TLC_512GB_InnovationIT 512GB
378GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U1014A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 286 3.5 81 86 4.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
37.9% Below average
Read 490
Write 434
Mixed 398
SusWrite 111
80% 358 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.1
44% 10.3 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 94%
Inateck FE202x Series 1TB
235GB free
Firmware: 1.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 311 343 399 394 398 146 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
65% Good
Read 208
Write 378
Mixed 264
SusWrite 332
67% 296 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 37.6
4K Mixed 30.2
96% 30.9 MB/s
DQ Read 131
DQ Write 147
DQ Mixed 169
119% 149 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 65%
Great: 73%
Toshiba HDWD220 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: KP000A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 173 177 175 176 175 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 185
Write 188
Mixed 69.2
SusWrite 174
112% 154 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 7.5
4K Mixed 0.6
264% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 104%
Great: 104%
Seagate ST5000LM000-2AN170 5TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 77 85 85 88 88 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
46.8% Average
Read 80
Write 105
Mixed 66.9
SusWrite 82.4
62% 83.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 0.5
147% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
89% Excellent
MC Read 33.8
MC Write 35.9
MC Mixed 28.9
94% 32.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 30.9
SC Mixed 23.5
68% 23.8 GB/s
Latency 82.5
48% 82.5 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 89%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 57 60 24" 1280 720 BNQ78ED BenQ GL2480
Typical H510M-A PRO (MS-7D22) Builds (Compare 8,388 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI H510M-A PRO (MS-7D22)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $374
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback