Asus Z97-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics96.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive114% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus Z97-A  (all builds)
Memory15.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151111
Uptime5.2 Days
Run DateDec 25 '17 at 12:25
Run Duration245 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 0.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
85% Excellent
Memory 94.2
1-Core 122
2-Core 241
86% 152 Pts
4-Core 409
8-Core 623
64% 516 Pts
64-Core 629
39% 629 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 85%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.71
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
Lighting 124
Reflection 138
Parallax 119
101% 127 fps
MRender 97.8
Gravity 123
Splatting 105
89% 108 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
125GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 512
Write 397
Mixed 411
98% 440 MB/s
4K Read 45.1
4K Write 94.4
4K Mixed 49.4
182% 63 MB/s
DQ Read 333
DQ Write 253
DQ Mixed 119
136% 235 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 114%
Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
30GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 514
Write 407
Mixed 419
99% 447 MB/s
4K Read 46.9
4K Write 95.5
4K Mixed 48.3
184% 63.6 MB/s
DQ Read 336
DQ Write 266
DQ Mixed 110
134% 237 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 115%
Great: 124%
Hitachi HDN726060ALE614 6TB
5TB free
Firmware: APGNW7JH Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 207
Write 183
Mixed 185
144% 192 MB/s
4K Read 0.95
4K Write 3.75
4K Mixed 0.45
159% 1.72 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 112%
Great: 121%
Hitachi HDN724030ALE640 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: MJAOA5E0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
Read 164
Write 152
Mixed 133
112% 150 MB/s
4K Read 0.99
4K Write 2.08
4K Mixed 0.22
104% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 87%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 93%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$86
2.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
64% Good
Read 113
Write 110
Mixed 118
86% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 2.05
4K Mixed 0.2
84% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 64%
Great: 88%
HGST HDN 724030ALE640 3TB
536GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
62.1% Good
Read 150
Write 153
Mixed 20.5
126% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1.06
4K Write 2.17
4K Mixed 0.21
85% 1.15 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 62%
WDC WD30 EFRX-68EUZN0 3TB
101GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
26.4% Poor
Read 74.3
Write 65.6
Mixed 64.9
86% 68.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.37
4K Mixed 0.18
21% 0.38 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CML16GX3M2A1600C10 0215 CML8GX3M2A1600C9 0215 CML16GX3M2A1600C10 0215 CML8GX3M2A1600C9 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
59.9% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 21.8
MC Mixed 18
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 21.6
SC Mixed 21
56% 19.5 GB/s
Latency 59.3
68% 59.3 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97-A Builds (Compare 5,057 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-A - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $798
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback