Asrock FM2A75 Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics26.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive6.67% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A75 Pro4  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130605
Uptime6.3 Days
Run DateDec 23 '17 at 21:45
Run Duration404 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 750K-$45
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Memory 82.6
1-Core 64.3
2-Core 119
56% 88.6 Pts
4-Core 193
8-Core 171
25% 182 Pts
64-Core 186
12% 186 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362
Nvidia(10DE 1000) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.5% Poor
Lighting 31.4
Reflection 32.7
Parallax 39.5
26% 34.5 fps
MRender 41.2
Gravity 37
Splatting 27.9
28% 35.3 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 100 120GB-$60
0GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM11.2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
6.67% Terrible
Read 73.7
Write 17
Mixed 20.1
8% 36.9 MB/s
4K Read 3.15
4K Write 1.74
4K Mixed 2.39
9% 2.42 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 6.67%
Great: 76%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
78.7% Very good
Read 143
Write 131
Mixed 126
100% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.92
4K Write 2.43
4K Mixed 0.28
114% 1.21 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 83%
Seagate Barracuda Green 1.5TB-$130
1TB free
Firmware: CC4A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
37.1% Below average
Read 72.9
Write 56.3
Mixed 70
50% 66.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.32
4K Write 0.88
4K Mixed 0.4
74% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 69%
Verbatim STORE N GO 32GB
0GB free, PID 0249
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
9.31% Terrible
Read 32.8
Write 13.7
Mixed 9.99
20% 18.8 MB/s
4K Read 5.32
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.24
31% 1.89 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.31%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CML16GX3M4A1600C9 CML16GX3M4A1600C9 CML16GX3M4A1600C9 CML16GX3M4A1600C9 16GB
667, 667, 667, 667 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.5% Below average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 12.5
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 7.8
SC Mixed 11.1
27% 9.37 GB/s
Latency 75.9
53% 75.9 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A75 Pro4 Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A75 Pro4 - $128

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $405
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback