Asrock FM2A75 Pro4

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	26.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	6.67% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock FM2A75 Pro4 (all builds)
Memory	12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1280 x 720 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130605
Uptime	6.3 Days
Run Date	Dec 23 '17 at 21:45
Run Duration	404 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	35%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X4 750K-$45 5,882 User benchmarks, average bench 51% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	57.4% Above average	Memory 82.6 1-Core 64.3 2-Core 119 56% 88.6 Pts	4-Core 193 8-Core 171 25% 182 Pts	64-Core 186 12% 186 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 57.4% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362 42,960 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Nvidia(10DE 1000) 2GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing below potential (64^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	26.5% Poor	Lighting 31.4 Reflection 32.7 Parallax 39.5 26% 34.5 fps	MRender 41.2 Gravity 37 Splatting 27.9 28% 35.3 fps
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 26.5% Great: 29%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
OCZ Trion 100 120GB-$60 4,424 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 0GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM11.2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3804 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 735 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 194 194 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 51 (C2) HDA temperature 62 54 197569151014	6.67% Terrible	Read 73.7 Write 17 Mixed 20.1 8% 36.9 MB/s	4K Read 3.15 4K Write 1.74 4K Mixed 2.39 9% 2.42 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 6.67% Great: 76%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 187 179 5633 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2630 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 82 82 13393 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 936 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 173 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 5584 (C2) HDA temperature 119 104 31 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 4 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	78.7% Very good	Read 143 Write 131 Mixed 126 100% 133 MB/s	4K Read 0.92 4K Write 2.43 4K Mixed 0.28 114% 1.21 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 78.7% Great: 83%
Seagate Barracuda Green 1.5TB-$130 20,479 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1TB free Firmware: CC4A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 106 99 735960 (03) Spinup time 93 92 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2673 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 78 60 4364511370 (09) Power-on hours count 73 73 24307 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 994 (B7) Unknown 98 98 2 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 98 4295163967 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 56 555024416 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 190 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 3375 (C2) HDA temperature 32 44 42949672992 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 10 3 735960 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 1778116473206 (F1) Unknown 100 253 211763565 (F2) Unknown 100 253 1231493677	37.1% Below average	Read 72.9 Write 56.3 Mixed 70 50% 66.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.32 4K Write 0.88 4K Mixed 0.4 74% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 37.1% Great: 69%
Verbatim STORE N GO 32GB 32 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 0GB free, PID 0249 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	9.31% Terrible	Read 32.8 Write 13.7 Mixed 9.99 20% 18.8 MB/s	4K Read 5.32 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.24 31% 1.89 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 9.31% Great: 35%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CML16GX3M4A1600C9 CML16GX3M4A1600C9 CML16GX3M4A1600C9 CML16GX3M4A1600C9 16GB 121 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 667, 667, 667, 667 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	35.5% Below average	MC Read 16.9 MC Write 6.7 MC Mixed 12.5 34% 12 GB/s	SC Read 9.2 SC Write 7.8 SC Mixed 11.1 27% 9.37 GB/s	Latency 75.9 53% 75.9 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 35.5% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical FM2A75 Pro4 Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A75 Pro4 - $128

CPU
A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)AMD $119Bench 50%, 18,312 samples	8x
A8-5600K APUAMD $250Bench 49%, 14,744 samples	7x
Athlon II X4 750KAMD $45Bench 51%, 5,882 samples	4x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	4x
RX 580AMD $120Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	3x
Radeon HD 7660DAMDBench 5%, 7,665 samples	2x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x
SSDNow UV400 120GBKingston $35Bench 67%, 80,916 samples	2x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	2x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 1x4GBKingstonBench 28%, 5,300 samples	2x
F3-17000CL11-4GBSR F3-17000CL9-4GBXM F3-17000CL9-4GBXM F3-17000CL11-4GBSR 16GBUnknownBench 43%, 2 samples	2x
HyperX DDR3 2400 C11 2x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 9,036 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $405

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363