Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire TC-120

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.38% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive43.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire TC-120  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire TC-120
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20140624
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMar 16 '22 at 09:10
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
46.7% Average
Memory 61.9
1-Core 59.1
2-Core 118
47% 79.5 Pts
4-Core 183
8-Core 185
24% 184 Pts
64-Core 181
11% 181 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 240
Asus(1043 048B) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
5.38% Terrible
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 9.1
Parallax 9.1
5% 8.23 fps
MRender 7.7
Gravity 6.7
Splatting 6.2
6% 6.87 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.38%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 100 120GB-$60
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM11.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 71 72 76 70 71 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
43.5% Average
Read 362
Write 168
Mixed 190
SusWrite 74.8
44% 199 MB/s
4K Read 14
4K Write 31.5
4K Mixed 10.9
52% 18.8 MB/s
DQ Read 267
DQ Write 142
DQ Mixed 118
111% 176 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 76%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
696GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 190 190 192 192 189 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 191
Write 131
Mixed 74.6
SusWrite 190
107% 147 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 109%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.6% Below average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 7.1
MC Mixed 13.7
34% 11.9 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 8.8
21% 7.27 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire TC-120 Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire TC-120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 7% - Terrible Total price: $60
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback