MSI MPG B550 GAMING CARBON WIFI (MS-7C90)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics52.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
9 months ago, 9 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C90
MotherboardMSI MPG B550 GAMING CARBON WIFI (MS-7C90)  (all builds)
Memory23 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211220
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateSep 03 '23 at 01:38
Run Duration316 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Memory 80.7
1-Core 124
2-Core 245
83% 150 Pts
4-Core 485
8-Core 865
81% 675 Pts
64-Core 1,253
78% 1,253 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$120
CLim: 1380 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.8.2
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.6% Above average
Lighting 66.4
Reflection 63.5
Parallax 99.8
54% 76.6 fps
MRender 64.2
Gravity 76.3
Splatting 47
50% 62.5 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M4 128GB-$116
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 000F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 182 187 189 128 136 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
62.3% Good
Read 456
Write 194
Mixed 233
SusWrite 167
58% 263 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 72.6
4K Mixed 15.5
97% 37.8 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 119
DQ Mixed 24.8
47% 93.8 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 72%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
66GB free
Firmware: 505ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 132 131 131 132 108 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Read 407
Write 146
Mixed 206
SusWrite 128
49% 222 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 74.5
4K Mixed 35.5
132% 47.1 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 149
DQ Mixed 125
107% 159 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 73%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$70
808GB free
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1182 1227 1226 1257 1252 1258 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
236% Outstanding
Read 1512
Write 1308
Mixed 1,005
SusWrite 1,234
284% 1,265 MB/s
4K Read 50.3
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 65.3
218% 75.4 MB/s
DQ Read 636
DQ Write 812
DQ Mixed 464
423% 637 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 236%
Great: 255%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$70
192GB free
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 905 103 107 110 103 106 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
176% Outstanding
Read 1,466
Write 1,529
Mixed 1,076
SusWrite 239
241% 1,078 MB/s
4K Read 51.5
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 66.3
224% 77.7 MB/s
DQ Read 639
DQ Write 853
DQ Mixed 271
337% 588 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 176%
Great: 255%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60
2TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.2 0.9 2.6 18 118 118 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Write 48.9
Mixed 1.7
SusWrite 43.5
22% 31.4 MB/s
4K Write 0.3
17% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 31% Great: 67%
WDC WD50 00AAKS-75YGA0 500GB
350GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 72 72 72 72 72 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34% Below average
Read 72.3
Write 72.2
Mixed 53.2
SusWrite 71.7
91% 67.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
122% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 34%
Great: 34%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00MMMB0 3TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.1 0.7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
22.3% Poor
Read 106
Write 102
Mixed 84.4
SusWrite 1.3
93% 73.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
102% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 50%
ST315005 41AS 1.5TB
243GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 71 72 72 72 72 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
32.1% Below average
Read 78.5
Write 96.8
Mixed 56.2
SusWrite 71.6
103% 75.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1.1
95% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 38%
ST2000DM 001-1CH164 2TB
1TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.1 0.6 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
24.2% Poor
Read 141
Write 118
Mixed 88.5
SusWrite 0.9
107% 87.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
64% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL8G30C15U4B.8FE BL8G30C15U4B.8FE F4-3000C16-8GTZR F4-3000C16-8GTZR 32GB
2800, 2800, 2800, 2800 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
97.7% Outstanding
MC Read 38.2
MC Write 33.9
MC Mixed 32.8
100% 35 GB/s
SC Read 27.4
SC Write 37.2
SC Mixed 30.6
91% 31.7 GB/s
Latency 79.2
50% 79.2 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 97.7%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 22: 0P 3R 1G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
22% 14% 58 71 59 60 21.7" 1920 1080 GSM5B44 MP59HT
History: Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B | Score 22: 0P 3R 1G 4B
Typical MPG B550 GAMING CARBON WIFI (MS-7C90) Builds (Compare 2,781 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG B550 GAMING CARBON WIFI (MS-7C90)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $768
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback