MSI MPG B550 GAMING CARBON WIFI (MS-7C90)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics52.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
9 months ago, 9 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C90
MotherboardMSI MPG B550 GAMING CARBON WIFI (MS-7C90)  (all builds)
Memory22.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211220
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateSep 02 '23 at 18:27
Run Duration271 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Memory 79.8
1-Core 121
2-Core 243
82% 148 Pts
4-Core 482
8-Core 783
78% 633 Pts
64-Core 1,188
74% 1,188 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1380 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.8.2
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.8% Above average
Lighting 66.5
Reflection 63.6
Parallax 90.5
54% 73.5 fps
MRender 65.4
Gravity 76.4
Splatting 47
50% 62.9 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M4 128GB-$116
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 000F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 153 135 124 141 119 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
60.2% Good
Read 454
Write 193
Mixed 225
SusWrite 135
56% 252 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 71.2
4K Mixed 15.7
97% 37.5 MB/s
DQ Read 136
DQ Write 117
DQ Mixed 30
49% 94.5 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 72%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
66GB free
Firmware: 505ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 116 115 117 114 112 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
69.7% Good
Read 348
Write 128
Mixed 186
SusWrite 116
43% 194 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 73.9
4K Mixed 36.3
133% 47.2 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 137
DQ Mixed 122
104% 154 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 73%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$70
808GB free
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1188 1212 1220 1265 1265 1267 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
234% Outstanding
Read 1,497
Write 1,283
Mixed 1,015
SusWrite 1,236
282% 1,258 MB/s
4K Read 49.6
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 62.6
213% 73.7 MB/s
DQ Read 637
DQ Write 810
DQ Mixed 467
424% 638 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 234%
Great: 255%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$70
192GB free
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 858 104 105 109 133 106 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
173% Outstanding
Read 1,456
Write 1,517
Mixed 1,074
SusWrite 236
239% 1,071 MB/s
4K Read 50.2
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 65.6
220% 76.4 MB/s
DQ Read 638
DQ Write 812
DQ Mixed 261
326% 570 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 173%
Great: 255%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$66
2TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.4 4 3.2 3.7 1.4 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 7,948
Write 0.7
Mixed 1.7
SusWrite 2.8
1,420% 1,988 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Mixed 0
50% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 31% Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL8G30C15U4B.8FE BL8G30C15U4B.8FE F4-3000C16-8GTZR F4-3000C16-8GTZR 32GB
2800, 2800, 2800, 2800 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
96.9% Outstanding
MC Read 38
MC Write 33.4
MC Mixed 32.7
99% 34.7 GB/s
SC Read 27.2
SC Write 36.9
SC Mixed 30.4
90% 31.5 GB/s
Latency 80.9
49% 80.9 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 21.7" 1920 1080 GSM5B44 MP59HT
Typical MPG B550 GAMING CARBON WIFI (MS-7C90) Builds (Compare 2,785 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG B550 GAMING CARBON WIFI (MS-7C90)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $770
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback