Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics41.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X58A-UD7  (all builds)
Memory20.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121109
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateDec 20 '17 at 20:16
Run Duration327 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 X 980-$148
Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Memory 95.2
1-Core 95.3
2-Core 190
75% 127 Pts
4-Core 381
8-Core 582
60% 481 Pts
64-Core 737
46% 737 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 380X-$120
CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
41.6% Average
Lighting 53.3
Reflection 54.3
Parallax 63.5
44% 57 fps
MRender 52
Gravity 48.7
Splatting 40.9
38% 47.2 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 40%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Marvell Raid VD 0 1TB
887GB free
Firmware: MV.R Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
58% Above average
Read 395
Write 245
Mixed 305
70% 315 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 38.9
4K Mixed 14.5
74% 25.4 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 124
DQ Mixed 13.5
40% 85.8 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 58%
Great: 117%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
477GB free
Firmware: 2B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
177% Outstanding
Read 1,463
Write 1,113
Mixed 1,288
287% 1,288 MB/s
4K Read 42.2
4K Write 92.7
4K Mixed 31.6
154% 55.5 MB/s
DQ Read 38.3
DQ Write 181
DQ Mixed 31.5
47% 83.6 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 177%
Great: 353%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 2TB
971GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
137% Outstanding
Read 252
Write 225
Mixed 223
176% 233 MB/s
4K Read 0.64
4K Write 2.81
4K Mixed 0.25
107% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 137%
Great: 123%
IBM ServeRAID M5014 998GB
751GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.13
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 32% Great: 46%
IBM ServeRAID M5014 4TB
1TB free
Firmware: 2.13
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 81% Great: 130%
HGST HUS 724020ALA640 2TB
664GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
62.2% Good
Read 151
Write 149
Mixed 73
153% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.92
4K Write 2.43
4K Mixed 0.41
100% 1.25 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 62%
Sharkoon Rapidcase USB3 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Read 136
Write 126
Mixed 106
154% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1.09
4K Write 2.07
4K Mixed 0.23
82% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 57%
Sharkoon Rapidcase USB3 4TB
914GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
57.6% Above average
Read 134
Write 144
Mixed 131
177% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.69
4K Write 2.13
4K Mixed 0.2
82% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 64%
UFD 3.0 Silicon-Power16G 16GB
8GB free, PID 5500
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
10.8% Very poor
Read 33.2
Write 18.8
Mixed 8.85
22% 20.3 MB/s
4K Read 7.79
4K Write 0.005
4K Mixed 0.01
30% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x4GB
6 of 6 slots used
24GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
48.7% Average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 17.9
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 11.6
30% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 56.5
71% 56.5 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X58A-UD7 Builds (Compare 418 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $394
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback