Today's hottest deals

Samsung R540/R580/R780/SA41/E452/E852

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive30.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSamsung R540/R580/R780/SA41/E452/E852  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG R540/R580/R780/SA41/E452/E852
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100927
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateDec 09 '19 at 13:07
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 M 370-$167
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
38.3% Below average
Memory 58.7
1-Core 55.2
2-Core 87.9
42% 67.3 Pts
4-Core 112
8-Core 73.9
13% 92.8 Pts
64-Core 115
7% 115 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470
Sanyo(144D C07F) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 1% Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 120GB 120GB
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0816C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 188 39 22 30 30 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30.4% Below average
Read 218
Write 199
Mixed 198
SusWrite 84.2
39% 175 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 32.2
4K Mixed 0.6
44% 16.8 MB/s
DQ Read 178
DQ Write 35.6
DQ Mixed 42.2
48% 85.1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 81%
Samsung HM321HI 320GB-$40
118GB free
Firmware: 2AJ10002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 65 64 63 62 64 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
36% Below average
Read 61.8
Write 64.6
Mixed 39
SusWrite 63.4
42% 57.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 36%
Great: 50%
UFD 3.0 Silicon-Power16G 16GB
3GB free, PID 5500
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.5 11 10 15 12 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
7.01% Terrible
Read 24.2
Write 3.5
Mixed 11.9
SusWrite 11.4
15% 12.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
16% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.01%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KRE-D3S1333M/4G 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
20.4% Poor
MC Read 6.6
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 8.3
20% 7 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 5
14% 5 GB/s
Latency 131
30% 131 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical R540/R580/R780/SA41/E452/E852 Builds (Compare 161 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung R540/R580/R780/SA41/E452/E852

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 24% - Poor Total price: $24
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback