SYX SYX-SBT-X58

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	10.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	22.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	SYX SYX-SBT-X58 (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK SABERTOOTH X58
Memory	3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120809
Uptime	1.2 Days
Run Date	Aug 13 '23 at 22:42
Run Duration	298 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	32%

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-950-$100 36,389 User benchmarks, average bench 66% LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	66.7% Good	Memory 90.7 1-Core 76.3 2-Core 147 64% 105 Pts	4-Core 240 8-Core 300 35% 270 Pts	64-Core 340 21% 340 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 66.7% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 5770 37,602 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Sapphire(174B 1482) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.0 Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	10.6% Very poor	Lighting 14.3 Reflection 13.4 Parallax 13 12% 13.6 fps	MRender 11.1 Gravity 11.5 Splatting 9.4 9% 10.7 fps
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.6% Great: 11%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 211GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 12 11 13 12 15 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile)	22.2% Poor	Read 320 Write 21.5 Mixed 22 SusWrite 13.1 20% 94.3 MB/s	4K Read 16.5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 4 30% 6.83 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 22.2% Great: 134%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$69 27,212 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 201GB free Firmware: ST6OA3AA SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 56 57 57 57 57 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	31.5% Below average	Read 52.6 Write 55.2 Mixed 37 SusWrite 56.8 37% 50.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 31.5% Great: 61%
WDC WD140EDGZ-11 14TB 10TB free, PID 1068 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 30 30 30 30 31 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	50.7% Above average	Read 206 Write 167 Mixed 140 SusWrite 30.1 170% 136 MB/s	4K Read 7.3 4K Write 4.1 4K Mixed 2.5 252% 4.63 MB/s

ASMT 2105 8TB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 785GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 30 29 30 30 30 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	35.5% Below average	Read 161 Write 161 Mixed 69.4 SusWrite 29.6 131% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1 98% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 35.5% Great: 92%
WDC WD80 EZZX-11CSGA0 8TB 723GB free, PID 1561 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 15 15 16 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	30.4% Below average	Read 153 Write 153 Mixed 70.6 SusWrite 15.5 121% 97.9 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 1.1 92% 1.2 MB/s

WDC WD80 EZZX-11CSGA0 8TB 1.5TB free, PID 1561 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 15 15 16 16 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	24.8% Poor	Read 116 Write 119 Mixed 60.1 SusWrite 15.6 98% 77.9 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 1.1 89% 1.17 MB/s

WDC WD80 EFAX-68LHPN0 8TB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 898GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 15 16 15 15 16 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	34.5% Below average	Read 108 Write 125 Mixed 85.6 SusWrite 15.7 109% 83.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 1.1 209% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 34.5% Great: 83%
WDC WD80 EFAX-68LHPN0 8TB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 777GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 15 15 16 23 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	41.1% Average	Read 150 Write 150 Mixed 85.1 SusWrite 16.6 126% 100 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 5 4K Mixed 1.2 216% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 41.1% Great: 83%
SABRENT 14TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 5TB free, PID 1561 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.2 2.2 2.3 2.2 2.2 4.2 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	36.3% Below average	Read 155 Write 153 Mixed 127 SusWrite 2.5 139% 109 MB/s	4K Read 6.6 4K Write 3.8 4K Mixed 3 256% 4.47 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 36.3% Great: 112%
SABRENT 14TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 1TB free, PID 1561 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 14 13 14 14 14 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	10.6% Very poor	Read 49.7 Write 31.1 Mixed 30.7 SusWrite 13.4 38% 31.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.3 16% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 10.6% Great: 112%
SABRENT 14TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 3TB free, PID 1561 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 16 16 16 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	36.6% Below average	Read 137 Write 142 Mixed 115 SusWrite 15.9 132% 102 MB/s	4K Read 6.6 4K Write 3.8 4K Mixed 2.8 249% 4.4 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 36.6% Great: 112%
SABRENT 16TB 5TB free, PID 1561 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 16 16 17 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	56% Above average	Read 177 Write 155 Mixed 105 SusWrite 16.1 140% 113 MB/s	4K Read 4.2 4K Write 8.4 4K Mixed 2 369% 4.87 MB/s	DQ Read 2.3 DQ Write 9.1 DQ Mixed 2 386% 4.47 MB/s

WDC WD20 0EDGZ-11BLDS0 20TB 2TB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 29 30 30 30 30 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	56.6% Above average	Read 132 Write 119 Mixed 103 SusWrite 30 123% 95.9 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 10 4K Mixed 1.3 388% 4.1 MB/s	DQ Read 1.1 DQ Write 11.1 DQ Mixed 1.3 426% 4.5 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6x2GB 38,297 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 6 of 6 slots used 12GB DIMM Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	40.8% Average	MC Read 15 MC Write 12 MC Mixed 15.4 40% 14.1 GB/s	SC Read 9 SC Write 8.8 SC Mixed 10.4 27% 9.4 GB/s	Latency 66.2 60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 40.8% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	67	54	60	21.7"	1280 720	GSM5AB8 LG IPS FULLHD

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SYX-SBT-X58 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 29%

Raft

System: SYX SYX-SBT-X58

CPU
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	8x
Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples	1x
Core i7 X 980Intel $148Bench 76%, 8,133 samples	1x

GPU
RX 6500-XTAMD $140Bench 50%, 2,413 samples	3x
GeForce GT 640NvidiaBench 6%, 34,519 samples	1x
R9 270AMD $140Bench 24%, 47,409 samples	1x

SSD
850 Evo 1TBSamsung $122Bench 110%, 154,399 samples	1x
Solid State Disk 120GBSpccBench 59%, 22,489 samples	1x
545s Series 128GBIntelBench 76%, 2,701 samples	1x

RAM
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	5x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	2x
14GBUnknownBench 35%, 9,406 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $362

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16